IGSD.L vs. UC81.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IGSD.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L).
IGSD.L and UC81.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGSD.L is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. It was launched on Oct 16, 2013. UC81.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. It was launched on Dec 1, 2014. Both IGSD.L and UC81.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IGSD.L vs. UC81.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IGSD.L vs. UC81.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGSD.L iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.50% | -0.44% | 7.51% | 0.40% | 7.27% | 0.80% | 1.22% | 3.52% | 7.44% | -6.51% |
UC81.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.94% | -0.20% | 6.44% | 0.38% | 4.76% | 0.32% | 1.51% | 4.23% | 6.12% | -6.53% |
Different Trading Currencies
IGSD.L is traded in GBP, while UC81.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC81.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGSD.L achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly higher than UC81.L's 0.94% return. Over the past 10 years, IGSD.L has outperformed UC81.L with an annualized return of 3.75%, while UC81.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.21% annualized return.
IGSD.L
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 2.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- 3.75%
UC81.L
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 1.76%
- 3Y*
- 2.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- 3.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGSD.L vs. UC81.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGSD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than UC81.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IGSD.L vs. UC81.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGSD.L
UC81.L
IGSD.L vs. UC81.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IGSD.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGSD.L | UC81.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.34 | 0.27 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.53 | 0.43 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.05 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 0.42 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.96 | 0.82 | +0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGSD.L | UC81.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 0.27 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.38 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.35 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.44 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between IGSD.L and UC81.L is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IGSD.L vs. UC81.L - Dividend Comparison
IGSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than UC81.L's 4.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGSD.L iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) | 5.03% | 5.08% | 4.67% | 3.69% | 2.12% | 1.71% | 2.51% | 3.32% | 2.94% | 2.50% | 2.16% | 2.11% |
UC81.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 4.65% | 5.59% | 4.77% | 3.28% | 1.36% | 1.58% | 2.75% | 2.90% | 2.20% | 2.16% | 1.86% | 0.84% |
Drawdowns
IGSD.L vs. UC81.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGSD.L drawdown since its inception was -14.83%, roughly equal to the maximum UC81.L drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGSD.L and UC81.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGSD.L | UC81.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.83% | -14.94% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.35% | -5.07% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.83% | -14.31% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.83% | -14.94% | +0.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.81% | -2.12% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -5.60% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.62% | +0.10% |
Volatility
IGSD.L vs. UC81.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IGSD.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC81.L) have volatilities of 1.94% and 1.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IGSD.L | UC81.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.94% | 1.93% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.19% | 4.20% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.47% | 6.44% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.84% | 7.81% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.17% | 9.20% | -0.03% |