IGG.L vs. CME
Compare and contrast key facts about IG Group Holdings plc (IGG.L) and CME Group Inc. (CME).
Performance
IGG.L vs. CME - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IGG.L vs. CME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGG.L IG Group Holdings plc | 10.49% | 38.70% | 36.61% | 4.52% | -689.76% | -0.55% | 31.19% | -141.00% | -15.70% | 53.24% |
CME CME Group Inc. | 12.84% | 11.29% | 17.43% | 24.76% | -13.72% | 30.70% | -9.09% | 5.49% | 39.98% | 20.90% |
Different Trading Currencies
IGG.L is traded in GBp, while CME is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CME values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
IGG.L:
£2.61
CME:
$11.23
IGG.L:
5.56
CME:
26.45
IGG.L:
1.99
CME:
2.31
IGG.L:
2.58
CME:
16.41
IGG.L:
£2.06B
CME:
$6.52B
IGG.L:
£1.63B
CME:
$5.61B
IGG.L:
£552.60M
CME:
$5.72B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGG.L achieves a 10.49% return, which is significantly lower than CME's 12.84% return. Over the past 10 years, IGG.L has outperformed CME with an annualized return of 18.96%, while CME has yielded a comparatively lower 17.05% annualized return.
IGG.L
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 8.84%
- YTD
- 10.49%
- 6M
- 36.05%
- 1Y
- 57.04%
- 3Y*
- 34.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- 18.96%
CME
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.09%
- YTD
- 12.84%
- 6M
- 16.49%
- 1Y
- 14.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.06%
- 10Y*
- 17.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGG.L vs. CME — Risk / Return Rank
IGG.L
CME
IGG.L vs. CME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IG Group Holdings plc (IGG.L) and CME Group Inc. (CME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGG.L | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.37 | 0.72 | +1.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.93 | 1.09 | +2.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.14 | +0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.02 | 1.12 | +4.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.11 | 2.43 | +14.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGG.L | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 0.72 | +1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | 0.70 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.36 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between IGG.L and CME is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IGG.L vs. CME - Dividend Comparison
IGG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than CME's 3.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGG.L IG Group Holdings plc | 2.29% | 3.59% | 4.66% | 5.90% | 129.13% | 5.31% | 5.01% | 330.39% | 7.58% | 4.50% | 6.35% | 3.51% |
CME CME Group Inc. | 3.77% | 1.83% | 4.48% | 4.58% | 5.05% | 3.00% | 3.24% | 2.74% | 2.42% | 4.20% | 4.90% | 5.41% |
Drawdowns
IGG.L vs. CME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGG.L drawdown since its inception was -137.83%, which is greater than CME's maximum drawdown of -69.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGG.L and CME.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGG.L | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -137.83% | -77.50% | -60.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -10.13% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1,247.39% | -31.74% | -1,215.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -137.83% | -37.36% | -100.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -6.87% | +6.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.74% | -20.77% | -4.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 5.16% | -1.97% |
Volatility
IGG.L vs. CME - Volatility Comparison
IG Group Holdings plc (IGG.L) has a higher volatility of 7.73% compared to CME Group Inc. (CME) at 5.93%. This indicates that IGG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IGG.L | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.73% | 5.93% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.14% | 14.20% | +3.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.93% | 19.87% | +4.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 304.20% | 20.10% | +284.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 220.27% | 24.34% | +195.93% |
Financials
IGG.L vs. CME - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IG Group Holdings plc and CME Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities