IGD vs. ETJ

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

IGD (Voya Global Equity Dividend and Premium Opportunity Fund) and ETJ (Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund) are both Global Equity Income funds. Over the past 10 years, IGD returned 9.57%/yr vs 8.31%/yr for ETJ. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IGD charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for ETJ.

Performance

IGD vs. ETJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Global Equity Dividend and Premium Opportunity Fund (IGD) and Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund (ETJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGD achieves a 20.40% return, which is significantly higher than ETJ's 0.82% return. Over the past 10 years, IGD has outperformed ETJ with an annualized return of 9.57%, while ETJ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.31% annualized return.

IGD

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 6.33%
• 6M: 18.95%
• YTD: 20.40%
• 1Y: 27.21%
• 3Y*: 20.70%
• 5Y*: 12.41%
• 10Y*: 9.57%
• ALL TIME*: 5.71%

ETJ

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 1.49%
• 6M: -0.81%
• YTD: 0.82%
• 1Y: 3.88%
• 3Y*: 10.01%
• 5Y*: 2.88%
• 10Y*: 8.31%
• ALL TIME*: 5.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ETJ Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund	$1.01M	$1.00M	$1.07M
IGD Voya Global Equity Dividend and Premium Opportunity Fund	$1.52M	$1.72M	$1.88M

IGD vs. ETJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IGD Voya Global Equity Dividend and Premium Opportunity Fund	20.40%	18.22%	22.44%	1.00%	-5.01%	29.11%	-7.25%	16.91%	-16.19%	25.85%
ETJ Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund	0.82%	3.49%	29.55%	14.15%	-22.74%	11.92%	22.31%	26.78%	-7.03%	18.93%

Correlation

The correlation between IGD and ETJ is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.55
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007	0.52

The correlation between IGD and ETJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IGD vs. ETJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IGD

IGD Risk / Return Rank: 89
IGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
IGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
IGD Omega Ratio Rank: 81
IGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IGD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

ETJ

ETJ Risk / Return Rank: 7
ETJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
ETJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
ETJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7
ETJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
ETJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IGD vs. ETJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Global Equity Dividend and Premium Opportunity Fund (IGD) and Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund (ETJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IGD	ETJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	0.25	+1.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	0.43	+2.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.05	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.34	0.27	+4.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.70	0.99	+13.70

IGD vs. ETJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGD Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the ETJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGD and ETJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IGD vs. ETJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGD drawdown since its inception was -59.29%, which is greater than ETJ's maximum drawdown of -32.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGD and ETJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGD	ETJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.29%	-32.81%	-26.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.20%	-10.40%	+4.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.01%	-15.44%	+4.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.81%	-28.55%	+12.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.03%	-32.81%	-8.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.15%	+1.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.82%	-7.48%	-2.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	2.86%	-1.03%

Volatility

IGD vs. ETJ - Volatility Comparison

Voya Global Equity Dividend and Premium Opportunity Fund (IGD) and Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund (ETJ) have volatilities of 3.31% and 3.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGD	ETJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.31%	3.27%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.87%	9.53%	+0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.07%	11.63%	+0.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.59%	15.63%	-1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.49%	17.97%	-1.48%

IGD vs. ETJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGD has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is higher than ETJ's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IGD vs. ETJ - Dividend Comparison

IGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.92%, more than ETJ's 9.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ETJ Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund	9.27%	8.86%	8.16%	8.86%	11.68%	8.53%	8.79%	9.77%	11.23%	9.82%	12.46%	10.98%
IGD Voya Global Equity Dividend and Premium Opportunity Fund	9.16%	11.36%	11.44%	9.66%	8.87%	7.73%	9.20%	10.47%	12.49%	9.45%	13.23%	13.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGD and ETJ in my portfolio?

IGD and ETJ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGD or ETJ?

IGD has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to ETJ (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGD dropped -59.29% vs ETJ's -32.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.