PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGA vs. HGLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGA vs. HGLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Global Advantage and Premium Opportunity Fund (IGA) and Highland Global Allocation Fund (HGLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGA achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly higher than HGLB's -11.69% return.


IGA

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
4.32%
6M
4.26%
1Y
9.15%
3Y*
17.92%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*
10.15%

HGLB

1D
-0.65%
1M
-4.60%
YTD
-11.69%
6M
-12.19%
1Y
-3.49%
3Y*
9.77%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGA vs. HGLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IGA
Voya Global Advantage and Premium Opportunity Fund
4.32%18.32%21.06%7.55%-8.33%28.35%-8.03%9.37%
HGLB
Highland Global Allocation Fund
-11.69%51.74%-1.52%-6.15%14.53%53.22%-17.98%-31.46%

Correlation

The correlation between IGA and HGLB is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2019

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGA vs. HGLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGA
IGA Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
IGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGA Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
IGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGA Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

HGLB
HGLB Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
HGLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGLB Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HGLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGLB Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGA vs. HGLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Global Advantage and Premium Opportunity Fund (IGA) and Highland Global Allocation Fund (HGLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGAHGLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.99

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

-0.15

+1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.54

-0.29

+4.84

IGA vs. HGLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGA Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the HGLB Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGA and HGLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGA vs. HGLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGA drawdown since its inception was -57.16%, smaller than the maximum HGLB drawdown of -70.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGA and HGLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGAHGLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.16%

-70.40%

+13.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.95%

-23.34%

+16.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.22%

-23.34%

+12.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.98%

-29.88%

+12.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-21.43%

+20.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.04%

-18.20%

+10.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

11.90%

-9.88%

Volatility

IGA vs. HGLB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Voya Global Advantage and Premium Opportunity Fund (IGA) is 2.73%, while Highland Global Allocation Fund (HGLB) has a volatility of 6.01%. This indicates that IGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HGLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGAHGLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

6.01%

-3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.66%

12.86%

-5.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.63%

21.13%

-11.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

22.10%

-8.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.29%

27.62%

-11.33%

IGA vs. HGLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGA has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than HGLB's 0.02% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGA vs. HGLB - Dividend Comparison

IGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.38%, less than HGLB's 13.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HGLB
Highland Global Allocation Fund
12.43%11.57%14.27%12.82%10.32%9.39%15.44%11.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGA
Voya Global Advantage and Premium Opportunity Fund
11.38%11.37%11.38%9.25%9.06%7.60%9.01%8.05%9.78%7.87%10.83%10.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGA and HGLB have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HGLB has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to IGA (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGA dropped -57.16% vs HGLB's -70.40%.

IGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGA and HGLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer