PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEMA.L vs. VNRA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IEMA.L vs. VNRA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEMA.L) and Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IEMA.L vs. VNRA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IEMA.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
4.92%34.41%7.61%9.43%-20.23%-2.83%19.01%7.09%
VNRA.DE
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
-4.35%19.00%24.66%26.52%-19.81%27.66%20.41%8.53%
Different Trading Currencies

IEMA.L is traded in USD, while VNRA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VNRA.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMA.L achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly higher than VNRA.DE's -4.35% return.


IEMA.L

1D
4.28%
1M
-5.77%
YTD
4.92%
6M
9.12%
1Y
35.15%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
8.22%

VNRA.DE

1D
2.04%
1M
-3.88%
YTD
-4.35%
6M
-1.21%
1Y
18.76%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IEMA.L vs. VNRA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMA.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VNRA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

IEMA.L vs. VNRA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMA.L
IEMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IEMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VNRA.DE
VNRA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
VNRA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNRA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNRA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VNRA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNRA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMA.L vs. VNRA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEMA.L) and Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEMA.LVNRA.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.83

1.11

+0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.40

1.62

+0.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.24

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

1.92

+0.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.15

8.29

+1.86

IEMA.L vs. VNRA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the VNRA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMA.L and VNRA.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEMA.LVNRA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.11

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.70

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.76

-0.52

Correlation

The correlation between IEMA.L and VNRA.DE is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IEMA.L vs. VNRA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEMA.L nor VNRA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
IEMA.L
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNRA.DE
Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.89%

Drawdowns

IEMA.L vs. VNRA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMA.L drawdown since its inception was -39.66%, which is greater than VNRA.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMA.L and VNRA.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IEMA.LVNRA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.66%

-34.48%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.76%

-13.44%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.08%

-23.30%

-13.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.93%

-5.16%

-3.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.43%

-4.82%

-10.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

2.31%

+1.18%

Volatility

IEMA.L vs. VNRA.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEMA.L) has a higher volatility of 8.70% compared to Vanguard FTSE North America UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VNRA.DE) at 4.38%. This indicates that IEMA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNRA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IEMA.LVNRA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.70%

4.38%

+4.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.19%

8.75%

+5.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.13%

16.89%

+2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.17%

16.06%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.33%

18.21%

+1.12%