ICE vs. XLF
Compare and contrast key facts about Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF).
XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ICE or XLF.
Correlation
The correlation between ICE and XLF is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ICE vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ICE:
1.55
XLF:
2.47
ICE:
2.15
XLF:
3.51
ICE:
1.30
XLF:
1.45
ICE:
1.80
XLF:
4.82
ICE:
5.73
XLF:
14.26
ICE:
4.46%
XLF:
2.51%
ICE:
16.45%
XLF:
14.52%
ICE:
-73.94%
XLF:
-82.43%
ICE:
-1.10%
XLF:
-0.59%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICE achieves a 11.88% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's 7.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ICE having a 15.06% annualized return and XLF not far behind at 14.78%.
ICE
11.88%
11.80%
7.10%
23.08%
13.14%
15.06%
XLF
7.18%
3.13%
19.28%
32.76%
13.13%
14.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ICE vs. XLF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ICE
XLF
ICE vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ICE vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
ICE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than XLF's 1.33% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 1.08% | 1.21% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.27% | 1.13% | 1.21% | 1.13% | 1.19% |
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.33% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 2.40% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
ICE vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICE drawdown since its inception was -73.94%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICE and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ICE vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 2.82%. This indicates that ICE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.