ICE vs. XLF
Compare and contrast key facts about Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF).
XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ICE or XLF.
Correlation
The correlation between ICE and XLF is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ICE vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ICE:
1.32
XLF:
0.92
ICE:
1.80
XLF:
1.37
ICE:
1.26
XLF:
1.20
ICE:
1.75
XLF:
1.20
ICE:
5.10
XLF:
4.72
ICE:
4.86%
XLF:
3.94%
ICE:
18.83%
XLF:
20.15%
ICE:
-73.94%
XLF:
-82.43%
ICE:
-7.44%
XLF:
-7.66%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICE achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's -0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, ICE has outperformed XLF with an annualized return of 15.30%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively lower 13.86% annualized return.
ICE
9.85%
-7.13%
-0.69%
25.30%
14.42%
15.30%
XLF
-0.28%
-4.49%
3.80%
19.30%
19.43%
13.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ICE vs. XLF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ICE
XLF
ICE vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ICE vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
ICE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than XLF's 1.48% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICE Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | 1.12% | 1.21% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.27% | 1.13% | 1.21% | 1.13% | 1.19% |
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.48% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 2.40% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
ICE vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICE drawdown since its inception was -73.94%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICE and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ICE vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) is 9.89%, while Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) has a volatility of 13.51%. This indicates that ICE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.