PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBOC vs. BOKF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IBOC vs. BOKF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) and BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBOC achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly higher than BOKF's 6.87% return. Over the past 10 years, IBOC has outperformed BOKF with an annualized return of 12.77%, while BOKF has yielded a comparatively lower 9.59% annualized return.


IBOC

1D
-1.38%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
7.95%
6M
5.52%
1Y
13.23%
3Y*
18.03%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
12.77%

BOKF

1D
-1.59%
1M
-5.26%
YTD
6.87%
6M
8.63%
1Y
34.12%
3Y*
15.91%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
9.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBOC vs. BOKF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBOC
International Bancshares Corporation
7.95%7.41%19.11%21.97%10.94%16.51%-9.51%28.67%-11.78%-0.96%
BOKF
BOK Financial Corporation
6.87%13.77%27.19%-15.25%0.59%57.59%-18.97%22.09%-18.98%13.57%

Correlation

The correlation between IBOC and BOKF is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 1996

0.56

The correlation between IBOC and BOKF shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.79 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

IBOC:

$8.95

BOKF:

$9.92

PE Ratio

IBOC:

7.94

BOKF:

12.64

PEG Ratio

IBOC:

0.55

BOKF:

11.21

PS Ratio

IBOC:

4.12

BOKF:

2.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

IBOC:

$804.91M

BOKF:

$2.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IBOC:

$632.71M

BOKF:

$1.83B

EBITDA (TTM)

IBOC:

$416.98M

BOKF:

$806.38M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBOC vs. BOKF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBOC
IBOC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IBOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBOC Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IBOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBOC Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

BOKF
BOKF Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
BOKF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOKF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOKF Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BOKF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOKF Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBOC vs. BOKF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) and BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBOCBOKFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.56

1.46

-0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.95

2.04

-1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.27

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

3.36

-2.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.44

7.85

-5.40

IBOC vs. BOKF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBOC Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the BOKF Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBOC and BOKF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBOCBOKFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

1.46

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.33

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.29

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.16

+0.18

Drawdowns

IBOC vs. BOKF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBOC drawdown since its inception was -77.43%, smaller than the maximum BOKF drawdown of -86.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBOC and BOKF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBOCBOKFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.43%

-86.36%

+8.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.74%

-10.19%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.09%

-29.72%

+5.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.09%

-42.75%

+18.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.37%

-64.97%

+1.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.83%

-8.77%

+4.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.76%

-18.82%

+2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.43%

4.36%

+1.07%

Volatility

IBOC vs. BOKF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is 5.05%, while BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that IBOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOKF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBOCBOKFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

6.22%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.56%

14.04%

+2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.83%

23.48%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.43%

28.17%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.21%

33.54%

+0.67%

Dividends

IBOC vs. BOKF - Dividend Comparison

IBOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, more than BOKF's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOKF
BOK Financial Corporation
1.96%1.98%2.09%2.53%2.05%1.98%2.99%2.30%2.59%1.92%2.08%2.81%
IBOC
International Bancshares Corporation
2.01%2.11%2.09%2.32%2.62%2.71%2.94%2.44%2.18%1.66%1.47%2.26%

Financials

IBOC vs. BOKF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between International Bancshares Corporation and BOK Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B202220232024202520260
211.27M
(IBOC) Total Revenue
(BOKF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IBOC and BOKF have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOKF has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to IBOC (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBOC dropped -77.43% vs BOKF's -86.36%.

BOKF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBOC and BOKF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer