PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBHF vs. JAAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBHF vs. JAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHF) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBHF vs. JAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IBHF
iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF
0.41%6.60%8.55%10.40%-6.66%4.43%2.97%
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
0.73%5.16%7.43%8.59%0.49%1.39%0.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBHF achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than JAAA's 0.73% return.


IBHF

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
0.41%
6M
1.31%
1Y
5.49%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*

JAAA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.73%
6M
2.02%
1Y
4.95%
3Y*
6.82%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBHF vs. JAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBHF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than JAAA's 0.21% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IBHF vs. JAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBHF
IBHF Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IBHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHF Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHF Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

JAAA
JAAA Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
JAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
JAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBHF vs. JAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHF) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBHFJAAADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.87

2.75

-0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.75

3.53

-0.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.90

-0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

3.45

-1.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.50

24.01

-8.51

IBHF vs. JAAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBHF Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is lower than the JAAA Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBHF and JAAA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBHFJAAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

2.75

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

2.71

-1.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

2.69

-1.85

Correlation

The correlation between IBHF and JAAA is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IBHF vs. JAAA - Dividend Comparison

IBHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, more than JAAA's 5.15% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
IBHF
iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF
6.65%6.73%7.17%7.33%6.01%4.55%0.61%
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
5.15%5.30%6.35%6.11%2.74%1.21%0.26%

Drawdowns

IBHF vs. JAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBHF drawdown since its inception was -11.19%, which is greater than JAAA's maximum drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBHF and JAAA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBHFJAAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.19%

-2.64%

-8.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.40%

-1.46%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.19%

-2.64%

-8.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.03%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-0.26%

-1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

0.21%

+0.15%

Volatility

IBHF vs. JAAA - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds 2026 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHF) has a higher volatility of 0.56% compared to Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) at 0.41%. This indicates that IBHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBHFJAAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

0.41%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.12%

0.68%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95%

1.81%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.80%

1.69%

+4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.74%

1.67%

+4.07%