PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IBCS.DE vs. NQSE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

IBCS.DE vs. NQSE.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF (IBCS.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE).

IBCS.DE and NQSE.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBCS.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iBoxx® EUR Liquid Corporates Large Cap. It was launched on Mar 17, 2003. NQSE.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both IBCS.DE and NQSE.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IBCS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF (IBCS.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBCS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IBCS.DE
iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF		-0.47%2.84%3.66%7.36%-14.02%-1.42%2.71%6.17%-0.50%
NQSE.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		-6.44%18.16%24.07%52.10%-36.29%27.37%45.23%35.67%-15.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCS.DE achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly higher than NQSE.DE's -6.44% return.

IBCS.DE

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
-0.47%
6M
-0.50%
1Y
2.39%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
-0.56%
10Y*
0.65%

NQSE.DE

1D
-0.41%
1M
-2.50%
YTD
-6.44%
6M
-4.26%
1Y
20.47%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF

Often compared with IBCS.DE:
IBCS.DE vs. IEFIBCS.DE vs. IE3E.DEIBCS.DE vs. ECR1.DEIBCS.DE vs. ECR3.DEIBCS.DE vs. EFRN.DEIBCS.DE vs. EUNL.DEIBCS.DE vs. IS3N.DE
Often compared with NQSE.DE:
NQSE.DE vs. SXRV.DENQSE.DE vs. CNDX.ASNQSE.DE vs. QQQNQSE.DE vs. JEQP.LNQSE.DE vs. EQQB.DENQSE.DE vs. CNDX.LNQSE.DE vs. SXR8.DE

IBCS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBCS.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.

NQSE.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
IBCS.DE
iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

IBCS.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IBCS.DE
IBCS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
IBCS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE
NQSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF (IBCS.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IBCS.DENQSE.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.75

1.03

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

1.56

-0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.21

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

2.16

-1.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.34

7.74

-4.40

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBCS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCS.DE and NQSE.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IBCS.DENQSE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

1.03

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.49

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.67

-0.51

Correlation

The correlation between IBCS.DE and NQSE.DE is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IBCS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison

IBCS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, while NQSE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBCS.DE
iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF		3.11%3.03%2.74%2.31%1.05%0.73%0.85%0.99%1.10%1.09%1.27%1.57%
NQSE.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IBCS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCS.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.12%, smaller than the maximum NQSE.DE drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCS.DE and NQSE.DE.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

IBCS.DENQSE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.12%

-37.67%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-11.87%

+9.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

-37.67%

+19.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.87%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.87%

-8.83%

+4.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.39%

-8.72%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

3.31%

-2.65%

Volatility

IBCS.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF (IBCS.DE) is 1.56%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that IBCS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

IBCS.DENQSE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.56%

5.83%

-4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.21%

12.28%

-10.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16%

19.88%

-16.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.66%

20.89%

-16.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.43%

21.60%

-17.17%