IBCP vs. XLF
Compare and contrast key facts about Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF).
XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Performance
IBCP vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IBCP vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCP Independent Bank Corporation | 3.16% | -3.48% | 38.48% | 14.02% | 4.35% | 34.30% | -14.28% | 11.37% | -3.50% | 4.99% |
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | -9.40% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 22.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCP achieves a 3.16% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's -9.40% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IBCP having a 12.11% annualized return and XLF not far ahead at 12.44%.
IBCP
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -4.17%
- YTD
- 3.16%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 11.81%
- 3Y*
- 27.95%
- 5Y*
- 11.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.11%
XLF
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- YTD
- -9.40%
- 6M
- -7.56%
- 1Y
- 0.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- 9.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBCP vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
IBCP
XLF
IBCP vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBCP | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.45 | 0.03 | +0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | 0.18 | +0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.02 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 0.13 | +0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.77 | 0.38 | +1.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBCP | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 0.03 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.50 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.56 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.20 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCP and XLF is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IBCP vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
IBCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than XLF's 1.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCP Independent Bank Corporation | 3.18% | 3.20% | 2.76% | 3.54% | 3.68% | 3.52% | 4.33% | 3.18% | 2.85% | 1.88% | 1.57% | 1.71% |
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.60% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
IBCP vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCP drawdown since its inception was -97.75%, which is greater than XLF's maximum drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCP and XLF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCP | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.75% | -82.69% | -15.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.50% | -14.79% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.45% | -25.81% | -10.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.75% | -42.86% | -18.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.06% | -12.01% | +0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.42% | -20.10% | -14.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.54% | 4.90% | +1.64% |
Volatility
IBCP vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 4.75%. This indicates that IBCP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IBCP | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.02% | 4.75% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.99% | 11.45% | +6.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.09% | 19.29% | +6.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.63% | 18.69% | +10.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.57% | 22.19% | +12.38% |