PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IBCP vs. XLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IBCP and XLF is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

IBCP vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
9.29%
18.63%
IBCP
XLF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IBCP:

1.56

XLF:

2.47

Sortino Ratio

IBCP:

2.47

XLF:

3.51

Omega Ratio

IBCP:

1.29

XLF:

1.45

Calmar Ratio

IBCP:

0.60

XLF:

4.82

Martin Ratio

IBCP:

8.26

XLF:

14.26

Ulcer Index

IBCP:

6.32%

XLF:

2.51%

Daily Std Dev

IBCP:

33.39%

XLF:

14.52%

Max Drawdown

IBCP:

-99.59%

XLF:

-82.43%

Current Drawdown

IBCP:

-79.79%

XLF:

-0.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCP achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's 7.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IBCP having a 14.62% annualized return and XLF not far ahead at 14.70%.


IBCP

YTD

1.54%

1M

2.75%

6M

9.29%

1Y

44.90%

5Y*

14.84%

10Y*

14.62%

XLF

YTD

7.18%

1M

3.13%

6M

18.63%

1Y

32.76%

5Y*

12.97%

10Y*

14.70%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IBCP vs. XLF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IBCP is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IBCP is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IBCP is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IBCP is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IBCP is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IBCP is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

XLF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLF is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLF is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLF is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLF is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLF is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLF is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IBCP vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IBCP, currently valued at 1.56, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.562.47
The chart of Sortino ratio for IBCP, currently valued at 2.47, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.473.51
The chart of Omega ratio for IBCP, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.291.45
The chart of Calmar ratio for IBCP, currently valued at 0.60, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.604.82
The chart of Martin ratio for IBCP, currently valued at 8.26, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.008.2614.26
IBCP
XLF

The current IBCP Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCP and XLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.56
2.47
IBCP
XLF

Dividends

IBCP vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

IBCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than XLF's 1.33% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation
2.79%2.76%3.54%3.68%3.52%4.33%3.18%2.85%1.88%1.57%1.71%1.38%
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.33%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.86%2.09%1.48%1.63%2.40%1.98%

Drawdowns

IBCP vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCP drawdown since its inception was -99.59%, which is greater than XLF's maximum drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCP and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-79.79%
-0.59%
IBCP
XLF

Volatility

IBCP vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 2.82%. This indicates that IBCP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
7.64%
2.82%
IBCP
XLF
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab