IBCI.DE vs. EUNA.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE).
IBCI.DE and EUNA.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBCI.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. It was launched on Nov 18, 2005. EUNA.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). It was launched on Nov 21, 2017. Both IBCI.DE and EUNA.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IBCI.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IBCI.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCI.DE iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF | 1.77% | 0.81% | -0.17% | 5.41% | -9.30% | 6.19% | 2.83% | 6.31% | -1.54% | -1.10% |
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -0.50% | 2.79% | 1.60% | 4.36% | -13.52% | -2.37% | 3.70% | 5.06% | -1.17% | -0.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBCI.DE achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than EUNA.DE's -0.50% return.
IBCI.DE
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 2.91%
- 3Y*
- 1.71%
- 5Y*
- 0.48%
- 10Y*
- 1.48%
EUNA.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 1.34%
- 3Y*
- 2.07%
- 5Y*
- -1.25%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBCI.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBCI.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IBCI.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IBCI.DE
EUNA.DE
IBCI.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBCI.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 0.37 | +0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 0.53 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.07 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 0.52 | +1.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.35 | 1.37 | +2.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBCI.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 0.37 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | -0.27 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | -0.05 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between IBCI.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
IBCI.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBCI.DE nor EUNA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IBCI.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBCI.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.37%, smaller than the maximum EUNA.DE drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCI.DE and EUNA.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBCI.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.37% | -17.79% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.87% | -2.57% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.37% | -17.03% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.81% | -8.69% | +1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -6.72% | +1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 0.97% | -0.20% |
Volatility
IBCI.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) have volatilities of 1.78% and 1.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IBCI.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 1.74% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.50% | 2.38% | +0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 3.60% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.83% | 4.58% | +2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.14% | 4.27% | +1.87% |