IAT vs. VTI
IAT (iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IAT is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Regional Banks Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IAT returned 9.74%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for VTI. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IAT charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
IAT vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAT achieves a 11.98% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 8.82% return. Over the past 10 years, IAT has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 9.74%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.
IAT
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 7.24%
- YTD
- 11.98%
- 6M
- 9.77%
- 1Y
- 31.31%
- 3Y*
- 27.52%
- 5Y*
- 4.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.74%
VTI
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 8.82%
- 6M
- 7.71%
- 1Y
- 24.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
IAT vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF | 11.98% | 13.05% | 24.36% | -8.53% | -20.61% | 38.89% | -7.60% | 31.38% | -17.45% | 10.42% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 8.82% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAT and VTI is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IAT and VTI has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IAT vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IAT
VTI
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
IAT
VTI
Basic Materials
IAT
-
VTI
Communication Services
IAT
-
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
IAT
-
VTI
Consumer Defensive
IAT
-
VTI
Energy
IAT
-
VTI
Healthcare
IAT
-
VTI
Industrials
IAT
-
VTI
Real Estate
IAT
-
VTI
Technology
IAT
-
VTI
Utilities
IAT
-
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAT vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
IAT
VTI
IAT vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAT | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.34 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 2.73 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.57 | 12.14 | -7.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAT vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAT drawdown since its inception was -77.22%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAT and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAT | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.22% | -55.45% | -21.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.49% | -8.92% | -8.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.29% | -19.30% | -9.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.55% | -25.36% | -30.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.55% | -35.00% | -20.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.69% | -2.85% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.91% | -8.01% | -18.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.87% | 2.00% | +4.87% |
Volatility
IAT vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF (IAT) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 4.95%. This indicates that IAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAT | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.82% | 4.95% | +1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.15% | 10.05% | +6.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.02% | 12.83% | +9.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.96% | 17.51% | +11.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.73% | 18.32% | +12.41% |
IAT vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAT vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
IAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than VTI's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAT iShares U.S. Regional Banks ETF | 2.65% | 2.94% | 2.95% | 3.56% | 3.12% | 1.88% | 2.87% | 2.49% | 2.48% | 1.55% | 1.52% | 1.78% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAT and VTI have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAT has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to VTI (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAT dropped -77.22% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.14% vs 9.74% for IAT. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 9.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IAT.
IAT has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 1.04% for VTI.
IAT is categorized as Financials Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. IAT tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Regional Banks Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IAT and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAT and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer