PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IAIX.L vs. XNNS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IAIX.L vs. XNNS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Artificial Intelligence Enablers UCITS ETF Acc (IAIX.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IAIX.L vs. XNNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IAIX.L
Invesco Artificial Intelligence Enablers UCITS ETF Acc
-4.42%20.04%20.41%
XNNS.L
Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
-8.89%6.27%7.52%
Different Trading Currencies

IAIX.L is traded in GBp, while XNNS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XNNS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IAIX.L achieves a -4.42% return, which is significantly higher than XNNS.L's -8.89% return.


IAIX.L

1D
3.70%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
-4.42%
6M
-2.72%
1Y
39.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XNNS.L

1D
1.89%
1M
-2.98%
YTD
-8.89%
6M
-8.31%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IAIX.L vs. XNNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IAIX.L and XNNS.L have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Return for Risk

IAIX.L vs. XNNS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IAIX.L
IAIX.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IAIX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAIX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAIX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IAIX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAIX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

XNNS.L
XNNS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XNNS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNNS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNNS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XNNS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNNS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IAIX.L vs. XNNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Artificial Intelligence Enablers UCITS ETF Acc (IAIX.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IAIX.LXNNS.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

0.33

+1.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.97

0.56

+1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.07

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

0.36

+2.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.64

1.10

+5.55

IAIX.L vs. XNNS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IAIX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the XNNS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IAIX.L and XNNS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IAIX.LXNNS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

0.33

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.47

+0.43

Correlation

The correlation between IAIX.L and XNNS.L is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IAIX.L vs. XNNS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IAIX.L nor XNNS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IAIX.L vs. XNNS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IAIX.L drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, which is greater than XNNS.L's maximum drawdown of -23.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAIX.L and XNNS.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IAIX.LXNNS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.60%

-23.14%

-8.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.39%

-16.12%

+0.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.70%

-12.87%

+1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.75%

-5.61%

-2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.75%

5.23%

+0.52%

Volatility

IAIX.L vs. XNNS.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Artificial Intelligence Enablers UCITS ETF Acc (IAIX.L) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNS.L) at 5.17%. This indicates that IAIX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNNS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IAIX.LXNNS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

5.17%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.52%

10.62%

+7.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.03%

17.27%

+10.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.88%

17.51%

+11.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.88%

17.51%

+11.37%