HYFC.L vs. GHYS.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Acc (HYFC.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GHYS.L).

HYFC.L and GHYS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HYFC.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE Time-Weighted US Fallen Angel Bond Select Index. It was launched on Jul 27, 2022. GHYS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Markit iBoxx Global Developed Markets Liquid High Yield Capped Index (GBP Hedged). It was launched on Jun 25, 2013. Both HYFC.L and GHYS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

HYFC.L vs. GHYS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Acc (HYFC.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GHYS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HYFC.L vs. GHYS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HYFC.L Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Acc	-1.65%	9.62%	5.17%	10.23%	-3.05%
GHYS.L iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF	-1.34%	15.68%	5.17%	17.49%	-3.84%

Different Trading Currencies

HYFC.L is traded in USD, while GHYS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GHYS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYFC.L achieves a -1.65% return, which is significantly lower than GHYS.L's -1.34% return.

HYFC.L

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: -1.81%
• YTD: -1.65%
• 6M: -0.60%
• 1Y: 5.63%
• 3Y*: 7.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GHYS.L

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: -1.28%
• YTD: -1.34%
• 6M: -0.39%
• 1Y: 9.30%
• 3Y*: 10.30%
• 5Y*: 2.66%
• 10Y*: 3.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYFC.L vs. GHYS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYFC.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GHYS.L's 0.55% expense ratio.

GHYS.L

iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF

HYFC.L

Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Acc

Return for Risk

HYFC.L vs. GHYS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYFC.L

HYFC.L Risk / Return Rank: 39
HYFC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
HYFC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
HYFC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 45
HYFC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
HYFC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 34

GHYS.L

GHYS.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
GHYS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
GHYS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
GHYS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 64
GHYS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
GHYS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYFC.L vs. GHYS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Acc (HYFC.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GHYS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HYFC.L	GHYS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	0.96	-0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	1.41	-0.17
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.18	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.93	1.31	-0.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.62	3.92	-0.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HYFC.L vs. GHYS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYFC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the GHYS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYFC.L and GHYS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HYFC.L	GHYS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	0.96	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.22	+0.55

Correlation

The correlation between HYFC.L and GHYS.L is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HYFC.L vs. GHYS.L - Dividend Comparison

HYFC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GHYS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.21%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HYFC.L Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GHYS.L iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF	7.21%	5.68%	5.78%	5.36%	4.41%	3.78%	4.08%	5.03%	4.89%	4.58%	4.91%	5.65%

Drawdowns

HYFC.L vs. GHYS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYFC.L drawdown since its inception was -8.42%, smaller than the maximum GHYS.L drawdown of -39.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYFC.L and GHYS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYFC.L	GHYS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.42%	-25.15%	+16.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.95%	-3.61%	-2.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.28%	-1.54%	-2.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.64%	-2.32%	+0.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.53%	0.69%	+0.84%

Volatility

HYFC.L vs. GHYS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Acc (HYFC.L) is 2.23%, while iShares Global High Yield Corp Bond GBP Hedged UCITS ETF (GHYS.L) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that HYFC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GHYS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HYFC.L	GHYS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.23%	4.02%	-1.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.52%	6.28%	-1.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.30%	9.66%	-3.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.92%	11.93%	-5.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.92%	13.25%	-6.33%