PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HXX.TO vs. ZAG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

HXX.TO vs. ZAG.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Europe 50 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXX.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO).

HXX.TO and ZAG.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HXX.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Europe 50 Rolling Future Index (Total Return). It was launched on Dec 6, 2016. ZAG.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 19, 2010. Both HXX.TO and ZAG.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

HXX.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Europe 50 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXX.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HXX.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HXX.TO
Global X Europe 50 Index Corporate Class ETF		-1.27%31.10%11.15%24.55%-9.72%14.01%5.46%20.53%-8.75%16.68%
ZAG.TO
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF		-0.11%2.25%4.48%6.41%-11.60%-2.60%8.34%6.84%1.12%2.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXX.TO achieves a -1.27% return, which is significantly lower than ZAG.TO's -0.11% return.

HXX.TO

1D
1.33%
1M
-3.74%
YTD
-1.27%
6M
0.40%
1Y
14.06%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
11.92%
10Y*
—

ZAG.TO

1D
-0.15%
1M
-1.81%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
-0.19%
1Y
0.05%
3Y*
3.29%
5Y*
0.55%
10Y*
1.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Europe 50 Index Corporate Class ETF

BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF

Often compared with HXX.TO:
HXX.TO vs. ZDI.TOHXX.TO vs. HSBA.LHXX.TO vs. XEQT.TOHXX.TO vs. TEC.TOHXX.TO vs. VFV.TOHXX.TO vs. XEU.TOHXX.TO vs. XESG.TO
Often compared with ZAG.TO:
ZAG.TO vs. VAB.TOZAG.TO vs. XBB.TOZAG.TO vs. XSB.TOZAG.TO vs. ZST.TOZAG.TO vs. ZMMK.TOZAG.TO vs. XBBZAG.TO vs. XCB.TO

HXX.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXX.TO has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than ZAG.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

HXX.TO
Global X Europe 50 Index Corporate Class ETF
ZAG.TO
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF

Return for Risk

HXX.TO vs. ZAG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HXX.TO
HXX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
HXX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
HXX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO
ZAG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ZAG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXX.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Europe 50 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXX.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HXX.TOZAG.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.73

0.01

+0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.11

0.05

+1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.01

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

0.14

+0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.92

0.29

+3.63

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HXX.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the ZAG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXX.TO and ZAG.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HXX.TOZAG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

0.01

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.08

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.23

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.44

+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between HXX.TO and ZAG.TO is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HXX.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Dividend Comparison

HXX.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZAG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HXX.TO
Global X Europe 50 Index Corporate Class ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZAG.TO
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF		3.49%3.48%3.44%3.47%3.56%3.04%2.88%3.03%2.92%2.95%3.07%3.13%

Drawdowns

HXX.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXX.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.23%, which is greater than ZAG.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXX.TO and ZAG.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

HXX.TOZAG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.23%

-18.03%

-15.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.34%

-2.79%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.91%

-15.77%

-13.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-18.03%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.55%

-2.85%

-4.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-3.56%

-1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

1.41%

+2.35%

Volatility

HXX.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Europe 50 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXX.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.46% compared to BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) at 1.91%. This indicates that HXX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZAG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

HXX.TOZAG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.46%

1.91%

+6.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.72%

2.97%

+9.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.35%

4.65%

+14.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.15%

6.53%

+11.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

7.09%

+11.69%