HXF.TO vs. HSAV.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO).
HXF.TO and HSAV.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HXF.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index (Total Return). It was launched on Sep 16, 2013. HSAV.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Feb 5, 2020.
Performance
HXF.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HXF.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXF.TO Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF | -4.96% | 35.34% | 30.20% | 12.45% | -9.00% | 35.14% | -2.82% |
HSAV.TO Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF | 1.13% | 2.58% | 4.24% | 5.04% | 2.79% | 0.66% | 0.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXF.TO achieves a -4.96% return, which is significantly lower than HSAV.TO's 1.13% return.
HXF.TO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- -4.96%
- 6M
- 5.45%
- 1Y
- 31.51%
- 3Y*
- 23.11%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
HSAV.TO
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 3.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.24%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HXF.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXF.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than HSAV.TO's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
HXF.TO vs. HSAV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXF.TO
HSAV.TO
HXF.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HXF.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.18 | 2.28 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.90 | 3.43 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.44 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 5.23 | -2.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.18 | 14.33 | -2.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HXF.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 2.28 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 1.87 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 1.77 | -1.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between HXF.TO and HSAV.TO is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HXF.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither HXF.TO nor HSAV.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
HXF.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.77%, which is greater than HSAV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXF.TO and HSAV.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXF.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.77% | -2.18% | -37.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.13% | -0.59% | -9.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.66% | -2.18% | -19.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.34% | 0.00% | -7.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -0.19% | -4.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 0.22% | +2.20% |
Volatility
HXF.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index Corporate Class ETF (HXF.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO) at 0.49%. This indicates that HXF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSAV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HXF.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.77% | 0.49% | +5.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 0.96% | +8.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.65% | 1.37% | +13.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.17% | 1.75% | +12.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 1.58% | +15.28% |