HXCN.TO vs. HHIC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF (HXCN.TO) and Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF (HHIC.TO).
HXCN.TO and HHIC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HXCN.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2020. HHIC.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Aug 19, 2025.
Performance
HXCN.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HXCN.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HXCN.TO Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF | 4.55% | 13.79% |
HHIC.TO Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF | 10.76% | 16.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXCN.TO achieves a 4.55% return, which is significantly lower than HHIC.TO's 10.76% return.
HXCN.TO
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 34.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.31%
- 5Y*
- 14.86%
- 10Y*
- —
HHIC.TO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -2.68%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 16.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HXCN.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HXCN.TO has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than HHIC.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HXCN.TO vs. HHIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXCN.TO
HHIC.TO
HXCN.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF (HXCN.TO) and Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF (HHIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HXCN.TO | HHIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.23 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.85 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.51 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HXCN.TO | HHIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 2.97 | -2.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between HXCN.TO and HHIC.TO is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HXCN.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Dividend Comparison
HXCN.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HHIC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.08%.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HXCN.TO Global X S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HHIC.TO Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF | 8.08% | 4.77% |
Drawdowns
HXCN.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXCN.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.09%, which is greater than HHIC.TO's maximum drawdown of -7.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXCN.TO and HHIC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXCN.TO | HHIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.09% | -7.26% | -29.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.24% | -2.68% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | -1.31% | -2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | — | — |
Volatility
HXCN.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HXCN.TO | HHIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.62% | 17.35% | -1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 17.35% | -3.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 17.35% | +0.60% |