HWWA.L vs. VTI
Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI).
HWWA.L and VTI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HWWA.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Jul 4, 2014. VTI is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Total Market Index. It was launched on May 24, 2001. Both HWWA.L and VTI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HWWA.L or VTI.
Key characteristics
| HWWA.L | VTI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.61% | 17.74% |
| 1Y Return | 15.61% | 27.69% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.63% | 8.25% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.44% | 14.53% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.15% | 12.29% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.48 | 2.11 |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.05% | 13.00% |
| Max Drawdown | -43.14% | -55.45% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.27% | -0.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between HWWA.L and VTI is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
HWWA.L vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, HWWA.L achieves a 9.61% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 17.74% return. Over the past 10 years, HWWA.L has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 11.15%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.29% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HWWA.L vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWWA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HWWA.L vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HWWA.L vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
HWWA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than VTI's 1.32% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWWA.L HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF | 1.55% | 2.40% | 2.51% | 2.02% | 1.89% | 2.70% | 2.84% | 2.39% | 2.30% | 3.01% | 0.68% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.74% |
Drawdowns
HWWA.L vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWWA.L drawdown since its inception was -43.14%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWWA.L and VTI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HWWA.L vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
HSBC Multi Factor Worldwide Equity UCITS ETF (HWWA.L) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.99%. This indicates that HWWA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.