HWLIX vs. HFCVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund (HWLIX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX).
HWLIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jun 24, 1987. HFCVX is managed by Hennessy. It was launched on Nov 1, 1996.
Performance
HWLIX vs. HFCVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HWLIX vs. HFCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWLIX Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund | 0.36% | 18.06% | 12.80% | 16.92% | -5.31% | 28.86% | -0.29% | 29.16% | -14.26% | 18.85% |
HFCVX Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund | 9.21% | 18.27% | 9.59% | 5.81% | 6.12% | 29.94% | -6.39% | 20.84% | -9.50% | 19.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HWLIX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than HFCVX's 9.21% return. Over the past 10 years, HWLIX has outperformed HFCVX with an annualized return of 11.49%, while HFCVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.85% annualized return.
HWLIX
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 4.82%
- 1Y
- 15.71%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
HFCVX
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 6M
- 12.87%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HWLIX vs. HFCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HWLIX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCVX's 1.23% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HWLIX vs. HFCVX — Risk / Return Rank
HWLIX
HFCVX
HWLIX vs. HFCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund (HWLIX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HWLIX | HFCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 1.44 | -0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 1.95 | -0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.30 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 1.72 | -0.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.15 | 7.47 | -2.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HWLIX | HFCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 1.44 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.93 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.66 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.40 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between HWLIX and HFCVX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HWLIX vs. HFCVX - Dividend Comparison
HWLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, more than HFCVX's 6.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HWLIX Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund | 8.09% | 8.12% | 11.29% | 11.12% | 8.48% | 0.86% | 1.65% | 1.62% | 3.55% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 1.59% |
HFCVX Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund | 6.77% | 7.39% | 4.56% | 3.57% | 10.33% | 4.81% | 2.58% | 6.58% | 17.16% | 14.97% | 2.26% | 2.57% |
Drawdowns
HWLIX vs. HFCVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HWLIX drawdown since its inception was -70.48%, which is greater than HFCVX's maximum drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWLIX and HFCVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HWLIX | HFCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.48% | -65.75% | -4.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.97% | -11.00% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.69% | -16.81% | -7.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.72% | -39.39% | -7.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.18% | -1.46% | -2.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.57% | -8.28% | -2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 2.61% | +0.62% |
Volatility
HWLIX vs. HFCVX - Volatility Comparison
Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund (HWLIX) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) at 3.06%. This indicates that HWLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HWLIX | HFCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 3.06% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.09% | 6.83% | +3.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.80% | 12.75% | +6.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 13.28% | +4.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.60% | 16.48% | +5.12% |