HURA.TO vs. ZCLN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Uranium Index ETF (HURA.TO) and BMO Clean Energy Index ETF (ZCLN.TO).
HURA.TO and ZCLN.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HURA.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. It was launched on May 15, 2019. ZCLN.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2021. Both HURA.TO and ZCLN.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HURA.TO vs. ZCLN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HURA.TO vs. ZCLN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HURA.TO Global X Uranium Index ETF | 11.72% | 43.18% | 3.05% | 61.03% | -4.56% | 74.48% |
ZCLN.TO BMO Clean Energy Index ETF | 12.59% | 37.90% | -20.23% | -20.37% | 1.41% | -34.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HURA.TO achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly lower than ZCLN.TO's 12.59% return.
HURA.TO
- 1D
- 4.70%
- 1M
- -8.56%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- -0.03%
- 1Y
- 107.11%
- 3Y*
- 37.96%
- 5Y*
- 27.92%
- 10Y*
- —
ZCLN.TO
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 12.59%
- 6M
- 16.82%
- 1Y
- 55.63%
- 3Y*
- -0.61%
- 5Y*
- -2.35%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HURA.TO vs. ZCLN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HURA.TO has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than ZCLN.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HURA.TO vs. ZCLN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HURA.TO
ZCLN.TO
HURA.TO vs. ZCLN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium Index ETF (HURA.TO) and BMO Clean Energy Index ETF (ZCLN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HURA.TO | ZCLN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | 2.10 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.86 | 2.77 | +0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.34 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 4.23 | -0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.02 | 11.99 | -3.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HURA.TO | ZCLN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 2.10 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | -0.09 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | -0.29 | +1.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between HURA.TO and ZCLN.TO is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HURA.TO vs. ZCLN.TO - Dividend Comparison
HURA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than ZCLN.TO's 1.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HURA.TO Global X Uranium Index ETF | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.75% | 1.03% | 1.46% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.82% |
ZCLN.TO BMO Clean Energy Index ETF | 1.52% | 1.71% | 2.13% | 1.37% | 0.93% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HURA.TO vs. ZCLN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HURA.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, smaller than the maximum ZCLN.TO drawdown of -61.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HURA.TO and ZCLN.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HURA.TO | ZCLN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -61.07% | +17.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.61% | -12.95% | -17.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.97% | -50.26% | +7.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.39% | -34.06% | +11.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.35% | -40.99% | +26.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.03% | 4.57% | +8.46% |
Volatility
HURA.TO vs. ZCLN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Uranium Index ETF (HURA.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.09% compared to BMO Clean Energy Index ETF (ZCLN.TO) at 10.35%. This indicates that HURA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZCLN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HURA.TO | ZCLN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.09% | 10.35% | +2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.50% | 21.15% | +16.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.83% | 26.67% | +21.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.88% | 25.78% | +14.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.67% | 26.94% | +11.73% |