PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HURA.TO vs. XBM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

HURA.TO vs. XBM.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Uranium Index ETF (HURA.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO).

HURA.TO and XBM.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HURA.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. It was launched on May 15, 2019. XBM.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Can Natural Resource NR CAD. It was launched on Apr 12, 2011. Both HURA.TO and XBM.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

HURA.TO vs. XBM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Uranium Index ETF (HURA.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HURA.TO vs. XBM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HURA.TO
Global X Uranium Index ETF		11.72%43.18%3.05%61.03%-4.56%71.05%65.97%-16.96%
XBM.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF		10.87%50.69%5.96%2.84%3.69%32.04%31.54%1.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HURA.TO achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly higher than XBM.TO's 10.87% return.

HURA.TO

1D
4.70%
1M
-8.56%
YTD
11.72%
6M
-0.03%
1Y
107.11%
3Y*
37.96%
5Y*
27.92%
10Y*
—

XBM.TO

1D
7.03%
1M
-13.25%
YTD
10.87%
6M
30.13%
1Y
75.40%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
17.01%
10Y*
18.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Uranium Index ETF

iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF

Often compared with HURA.TO:
HURA.TO vs. U-U.TOHURA.TO vs. NUKZHURA.TO vs. CHPS.TOHURA.TO vs. HUZ.TOHURA.TO vs. XETM.TOHURA.TO vs. AGF-B.TOHURA.TO vs. XGD.TO
Often compared with XBM.TO:
XBM.TO vs. XMEXBM.TO vs. ZMT.TOXBM.TO vs. XEG.TOXBM.TO vs. GDXXBM.TO vs. VDEXBM.TO vs. XIC.TOXBM.TO vs. IAU

HURA.TO vs. XBM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HURA.TO has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than XBM.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.

HURA.TO
Global X Uranium Index ETF
XBM.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF

Return for Risk

HURA.TO vs. XBM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HURA.TO
HURA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HURA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HURA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HURA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HURA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HURA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
XBM.TO
XBM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
XBM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
XBM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HURA.TO vs. XBM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium Index ETF (HURA.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HURA.TOXBM.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

1.98

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.86

2.46

+0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

3.03

+0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.02

11.16

-3.14

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HURA.TO vs. XBM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HURA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the XBM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HURA.TO and XBM.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HURA.TOXBM.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.98

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.52

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.57

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.20

+0.57

Correlation

The correlation between HURA.TO and XBM.TO is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HURA.TO vs. XBM.TO - Dividend Comparison

HURA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than XBM.TO's 0.77% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HURA.TO
Global X Uranium Index ETF		0.08%0.09%0.75%1.03%1.46%1.26%0.63%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XBM.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF		0.77%0.86%1.25%2.09%4.83%3.01%1.81%3.71%3.43%1.63%2.42%5.70%

Drawdowns

HURA.TO vs. XBM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HURA.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, smaller than the maximum XBM.TO drawdown of -67.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HURA.TO and XBM.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

HURA.TOXBM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.51%

-67.40%

+23.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.61%

-23.88%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.97%

-40.57%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-57.24%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.39%

-13.62%

-8.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.35%

-26.05%

+11.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.03%

6.49%

+6.54%

Volatility

HURA.TO vs. XBM.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Uranium Index ETF (HURA.TO) is 13.09%, while iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO) has a volatility of 15.89%. This indicates that HURA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XBM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

HURA.TOXBM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.09%

15.89%

-2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.50%

28.48%

+9.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.83%

38.28%

+9.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.88%

32.75%

+7.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.67%

32.66%

+6.01%