HUG.TO vs. MNT.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Gold ETF (HUG.TO) and Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO).
HUG.TO and MNT.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HUG.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Gold Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER. It was launched on Jun 24, 2009.
Performance
HUG.TO vs. MNT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HUG.TO vs. MNT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUG.TO Global X Gold ETF | 7.30% | 57.93% | 24.13% | 11.48% | -1.87% | -5.30% | 19.82% | 15.86% | -4.52% | 10.34% |
MNT.TO Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves | 6.88% | 61.23% | 44.81% | 3.61% | 10.52% | -10.51% | 26.14% | 13.47% | 5.87% | 5.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUG.TO achieves a 7.30% return, which is significantly higher than MNT.TO's 6.88% return. Over the past 10 years, HUG.TO has underperformed MNT.TO with an annualized return of 11.28%, while MNT.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.79% annualized return.
HUG.TO
- 1D
- 3.60%
- 1M
- -11.44%
- YTD
- 7.30%
- 6M
- 18.79%
- 1Y
- 43.53%
- 3Y*
- 29.54%
- 5Y*
- 19.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.28%
MNT.TO
- 1D
- 3.93%
- 1M
- -11.28%
- YTD
- 6.88%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 40.58%
- 3Y*
- 35.64%
- 5Y*
- 24.73%
- 10Y*
- 14.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HUG.TO vs. MNT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
HUG.TO vs. MNT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HUG.TO
MNT.TO
HUG.TO vs. MNT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold ETF (HUG.TO) and Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUG.TO | MNT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | 1.27 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 1.75 | +0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.25 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 1.62 | +0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.51 | 5.94 | +2.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUG.TO | MNT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 1.27 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 1.24 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.76 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.47 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between HUG.TO and MNT.TO is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HUG.TO vs. MNT.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither HUG.TO nor MNT.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
HUG.TO vs. MNT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUG.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.99%, which is greater than MNT.TO's maximum drawdown of -34.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUG.TO and MNT.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUG.TO | MNT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.99% | -34.79% | -13.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.27% | -25.01% | +5.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.06% | -25.01% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.66% | -33.58% | +8.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.85% | -14.82% | +0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.04% | -15.65% | -7.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.35% | 6.81% | -1.46% |
Volatility
HUG.TO vs. MNT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Gold ETF (HUG.TO) is 10.58%, while Royal Canadian Mint - Canadian Gold Reserves (MNT.TO) has a volatility of 13.84%. This indicates that HUG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HUG.TO | MNT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.58% | 13.84% | -3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.01% | 27.16% | -3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.70% | 32.08% | -4.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 20.12% | -2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 19.50% | -3.12% |