HTWS.L vs. CIA.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Helios Towers plc (HTWS.L) and Champion Iron Limited (CIA.TO).

Performance

HTWS.L vs. CIA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Helios Towers plc (HTWS.L) and Champion Iron Limited (CIA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HTWS.L vs. CIA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HTWS.L Helios Towers plc	9.36%	79.89%	2.81%	-16.12%	-38.31%	12.42%	-3.16%	30.04%
CIA.TO Champion Iron Limited	-6.55%	8.30%	-32.55%	10.97%	48.20%	10.52%	87.82%	14.20%

Different Trading Currencies

HTWS.L is traded in GBp, while CIA.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CIA.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap HTWS.L : £2.14B CIA.TO : CA$2.73B
EPS HTWS.L : £0.07 CIA.TO : CA$0.35
PE Ratio HTWS.L : 25.22 CIA.TO : 14.65
PS Ratio HTWS.L : 2.60 CIA.TO : 1.52
PB Ratio HTWS.L : 27.74 CIA.TO : 1.81
Total Revenue (TTM) HTWS.L : £820.40M CIA.TO : CA$1.79B
Gross Profit (TTM) HTWS.L : £389.50M CIA.TO : CA$431.07M
EBITDA (TTM) HTWS.L : £397.90M CIA.TO : CA$533.55M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTWS.L achieves a 9.36% return, which is significantly higher than CIA.TO's -6.55% return.

HTWS.L

• 1D: 3.69%
• 1M: -10.22%
• YTD: 9.36%
• 6M: 20.81%
• 1Y: 68.86%
• 3Y*: 19.91%
• 5Y*: 1.27%
• 10Y*: —

CIA.TO

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: -6.55%
• 6M: 25.00%
• 1Y: 23.29%
• 3Y*: -7.25%
• 5Y*: 1.67%
• 10Y*: 40.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HTWS.L vs. CIA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTWS.L

HTWS.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
HTWS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
HTWS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
HTWS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 93
HTWS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
HTWS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 93

CIA.TO

CIA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 56
CIA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CIA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
CIA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CIA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
CIA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTWS.L vs. CIA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Helios Towers plc (HTWS.L) and Champion Iron Limited (CIA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HTWS.L	CIA.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	0.58	+1.90
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	1.04	+2.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.13	+0.32
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.66	0.75	+3.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.53	1.58	+11.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HTWS.L vs. CIA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTWS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the CIA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTWS.L and CIA.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HTWS.L	CIA.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	0.58	+1.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	0.04	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.35	-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between HTWS.L and CIA.TO is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HTWS.L vs. CIA.TO - Dividend Comparison

HTWS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
HTWS.L Helios Towers plc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CIA.TO Champion Iron Limited	4.12%	3.83%	3.86%	2.69%	4.40%

Drawdowns

HTWS.L vs. CIA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTWS.L drawdown since its inception was -71.22%, smaller than the maximum CIA.TO drawdown of -87.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTWS.L and CIA.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTWS.L	CIA.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.22%	-86.36%	+15.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.64%	-25.78%	+11.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-68.78%	-51.70%	-17.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.20%	-28.01%	+15.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.96%	-31.03%	-3.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.04%	11.64%	-6.60%

Volatility

HTWS.L vs. CIA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Helios Towers plc (HTWS.L) is 10.37%, while Champion Iron Limited (CIA.TO) has a volatility of 13.27%. This indicates that HTWS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HTWS.L	CIA.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.37%	13.27%	-2.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.61%	27.01%	-7.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.80%	40.57%	-12.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.60%	43.41%	-6.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.03%	57.05%	-16.02%

Financials

HTWS.L vs. CIA.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Helios Towers plc and Champion Iron Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

HTWS.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Helios Towers plc reported a gross profit of 103.70M and revenue of 209.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.6%.

CIA.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Champion Iron Limited reported a gross profit of 139.75M and revenue of 472.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.6%.

HTWS.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Helios Towers plc reported an operating income of 66.55M and revenue of 209.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.8%.

CIA.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Champion Iron Limited reported an operating income of 111.00M and revenue of 472.31M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.5%.

HTWS.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Helios Towers plc reported a net income of 15.20M and revenue of 209.15M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.

CIA.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Champion Iron Limited reported a net income of 64.97M and revenue of 472.31M, resulting in a net margin of 13.8%.