HTHT vs. MLKN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Huazhu Group Limited (HTHT) and MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN).

Performance

HTHT vs. MLKN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Huazhu Group Limited (HTHT) and MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HTHT vs. MLKN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HTHT Huazhu Group Limited	6.89%	50.26%	0.96%	-19.00%	14.31%	-17.08%	13.28%	39.96%	-19.86%	180.24%
MLKN MillerKnoll, Inc.	-20.18%	-15.73%	-13.01%	32.01%	-44.89%	17.99%	-17.99%	40.49%	-22.84%	19.65%

Fundamentals

Market Cap HTHT : $16.38B MLKN : $999.19M
EPS HTHT : $15.60 MLKN : $0.80
PE Ratio HTHT : 3.22 MLKN : 18.04
PEG Ratio HTHT : 0.04 MLKN : 1.33
PS Ratio HTHT : 0.65 MLKN : 0.26
PB Ratio HTHT : 1.28 MLKN : 0.71
Total Revenue (TTM) HTHT : $25.22B MLKN : $3.80B
Gross Profit (TTM) HTHT : $9.93B MLKN : $1.47B
EBITDA (TTM) HTHT : $8.67B MLKN : $322.30M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTHT achieves a 6.89% return, which is significantly higher than MLKN's -20.18% return. Over the past 10 years, HTHT has outperformed MLKN with an annualized return of 20.12%, while MLKN has yielded a comparatively lower -4.83% annualized return.

HTHT

• 1D: 2.91%
• 1M: -8.23%
• YTD: 6.89%
• 6M: 28.59%
• 1Y: 43.33%
• 3Y*: 4.39%
• 5Y*: -0.24%
• 10Y*: 20.12%

MLKN

• 1D: 2.63%
• 1M: -28.20%
• YTD: -20.18%
• 6M: -16.77%
• 1Y: -21.31%
• 3Y*: -7.66%
• 5Y*: -16.58%
• 10Y*: -4.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HTHT vs. MLKN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTHT

HTHT Risk / Return Rank: 80
HTHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
HTHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
HTHT Omega Ratio Rank: 76
HTHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
HTHT Martin Ratio Rank: 81

MLKN

MLKN Risk / Return Rank: 20
MLKN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
MLKN Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
MLKN Omega Ratio Rank: 22
MLKN Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
MLKN Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTHT vs. MLKN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huazhu Group Limited (HTHT) and MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HTHT	MLKN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	-0.45	+1.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	-0.34	+2.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	0.95	+0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	-0.63	+2.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.15	-1.43	+7.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HTHT vs. MLKN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTHT Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the MLKN Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTHT and MLKN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HTHT	MLKN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	-0.45	+1.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00	-0.37	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	-0.11	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.12	+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between HTHT and MLKN is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HTHT vs. MLKN - Dividend Comparison

HTHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than MLKN's 5.19% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HTHT Huazhu Group Limited	3.54%	3.78%	1.91%	2.78%	0.50%	0.00%	0.71%	0.00%	1.12%	0.43%	0.00%	2.18%
MLKN MillerKnoll, Inc.	5.19%	4.10%	3.32%	2.81%	3.57%	1.91%	1.18%	1.96%	2.50%	1.75%	1.86%	2.00%

Drawdowns

HTHT vs. MLKN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTHT drawdown since its inception was -64.02%, smaller than the maximum MLKN drawdown of -79.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTHT and MLKN.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTHT	MLKN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.02%	-79.45%	+15.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.68%	-37.80%	+18.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.43%	-72.06%	+8.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.02%	-72.06%	+8.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.29%	-66.80%	+56.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.97%	-27.82%	+1.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.19%	16.67%	-9.48%

Volatility

HTHT vs. MLKN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Huazhu Group Limited (HTHT) is 9.30%, while MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN) has a volatility of 27.45%. This indicates that HTHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLKN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HTHT	MLKN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.30%	27.45%	-18.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.85%	36.20%	-15.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.03%	48.16%	-16.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.13%	45.27%	+4.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.92%	44.36%	+4.56%

Financials

HTHT vs. MLKN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Huazhu Group Limited and MillerKnoll, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

HTHT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Huazhu Group Limited reported a gross profit of 2.57B and revenue of 6.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.9%.

MLKN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MillerKnoll, Inc. reported a gross profit of 352.90M and revenue of 926.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.1%.

HTHT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Huazhu Group Limited reported an operating income of 1.66B and revenue of 6.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.8%.

MLKN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MillerKnoll, Inc. reported an operating income of 44.90M and revenue of 926.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

HTHT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Huazhu Group Limited reported a net income of 1.16B and revenue of 6.43B, resulting in a net margin of 18.0%.

MLKN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MillerKnoll, Inc. reported a net income of 67.90M and revenue of 926.60M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.