HTHT vs. MLKN
HTHT (Huazhu Group Limited) and MLKN (MillerKnoll, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — HTHT in Lodging, MLKN in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances. Over the past 10 years, HTHT returned 19.10%/yr vs -3.42%/yr for MLKN. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HTHT vs. MLKN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTHT achieves a -6.96% return, which is significantly higher than MLKN's -10.33% return. Over the past 10 years, HTHT has outperformed MLKN with an annualized return of 19.10%, while MLKN has yielded a comparatively lower -3.42% annualized return.
HTHT
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -4.76%
- YTD
- -6.96%
- 6M
- -10.49%
- 1Y
- 30.74%
- 3Y*
- 8.11%
- 5Y*
- -1.74%
- 10Y*
- 19.10%
MLKN
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- -10.33%
- 6M
- -9.18%
- 1Y
- -3.35%
- 3Y*
- 7.42%
- 5Y*
- -17.09%
- 10Y*
- -3.42%
HTHT vs. MLKN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTHT Huazhu Group Limited | -6.96% | 50.26% | 0.96% | -19.00% | 14.31% | -17.08% | 13.28% | 39.96% | -19.86% | 180.24% |
MLKN MillerKnoll, Inc. | -10.33% | -15.73% | -13.01% | 32.01% | -44.89% | 17.99% | -17.99% | 40.49% | -22.84% | 19.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTHT and MLKN is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2010 | 0.22 |
The correlation between HTHT and MLKN shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HTHT:
$13.95B
MLKN:
$1.11B
HTHT:
CN¥15.32
MLKN:
$0.80
HTHT:
18.85
MLKN:
20.10
HTHT:
0.25
MLKN:
1.48
HTHT:
3.64
MLKN:
0.29
HTHT:
8.66
MLKN:
0.79
HTHT:
CN¥25.78B
MLKN:
$3.80B
HTHT:
CN¥10.45B
MLKN:
$1.47B
HTHT:
CN¥8.78B
MLKN:
$322.30M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTHT vs. MLKN — Risk / Return Rank
HTHT
MLKN
HTHT vs. MLKN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huazhu Group Limited (HTHT) and MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HTHT | MLKN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.03 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | -0.09 | +1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.92 | -0.16 | +4.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HTHT vs. MLKN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTHT drawdown since its inception was -64.02%, smaller than the maximum MLKN drawdown of -79.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTHT and MLKN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTHT | MLKN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.02% | -79.45% | +15.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.37% | -37.80% | +15.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.05% | -53.31% | +12.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.92% | -70.85% | +11.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.02% | -72.06% | +8.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.91% | -62.71% | +40.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.78% | -28.04% | +2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.85% | 21.34% | -13.49% |
Volatility
HTHT vs. MLKN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Huazhu Group Limited (HTHT) is 8.68%, while MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN) has a volatility of 13.41%. This indicates that HTHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLKN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTHT | MLKN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.68% | 13.41% | -4.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.39% | 38.03% | -15.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.79% | 48.14% | -18.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.05% | 45.55% | +4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.97% | 44.68% | +4.29% |
Dividends
HTHT vs. MLKN - Dividend Comparison
HTHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, more than MLKN's 4.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTHT Huazhu Group Limited | 4.95% | 3.78% | 1.91% | 2.78% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 1.12% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 2.18% |
MLKN MillerKnoll, Inc. | 4.67% | 4.10% | 3.32% | 2.81% | 3.57% | 1.91% | 1.18% | 1.96% | 2.50% | 1.75% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
Financials
HTHT vs. MLKN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Huazhu Group Limited and MillerKnoll, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HTHT vs. MLKN - Profitability Comparison
HTHT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huazhu Group Limited reported a gross profit of 2.31B and revenue of 5.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.8%.
MLKN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MillerKnoll, Inc. reported a gross profit of 352.90M and revenue of 926.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.1%.
HTHT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huazhu Group Limited reported an operating income of 1.49B and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.9%.
MLKN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MillerKnoll, Inc. reported an operating income of 44.90M and revenue of 926.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
HTHT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Huazhu Group Limited reported a net income of 812.06M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
MLKN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MillerKnoll, Inc. reported a net income of 67.90M and revenue of 926.60M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HTHT and MLKN have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLKN has higher volatility (13.41%) compared to HTHT (8.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTHT dropped -64.02% vs MLKN's -79.45%.
HTHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HTHT and MLKN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer