HTAB vs. VGVT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) and Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT).

HTAB and VGVT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HTAB is an actively managed fund by Hartford. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. VGVT is an actively managed fund by Vanguard. It was launched on Jul 7, 2025.

Performance

HTAB vs. VGVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) and Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HTAB vs. VGVT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF	0.14%	4.72%
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF	0.12%	3.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTAB achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly higher than VGVT's 0.12% return.

HTAB

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: -2.17%
• YTD: 0.14%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 3.09%
• 3Y*: 2.63%
• 5Y*: 0.63%
• 10Y*: —

VGVT

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -1.74%
• YTD: 0.12%
• 6M: 1.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTAB vs. VGVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTAB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VGVT's 0.10% expense ratio.

HTAB

Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF

VGVT

Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF

Return for Risk

HTAB vs. VGVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTAB

HTAB Risk / Return Rank: 29
HTAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
HTAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
HTAB Omega Ratio Rank: 30
HTAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
HTAB Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTAB vs. VGVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) and Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HTAB	VGVT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.55	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.76	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.14	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HTAB	VGVT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	1.45	-1.03

Correlation

The correlation between HTAB and VGVT is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HTAB vs. VGVT - Dividend Comparison

HTAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than VGVT's 2.95% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF	3.94%	3.88%	3.57%	3.21%	2.26%	2.18%	1.64%	2.77%	1.61%
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF	2.95%	2.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HTAB vs. VGVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTAB drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, which is greater than VGVT's maximum drawdown of -2.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTAB and VGVT.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTAB	VGVT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.76%	-2.42%	-12.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.17%	-1.74%	-0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.93%	-0.42%	-2.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HTAB	VGVT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.74%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.54%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.70%	3.27%	+2.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.70%	3.27%	+2.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.19%	3.27%	+1.92%