PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSTRX vs. HABDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSTRX vs. HABDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund (HSTRX) and Harbor Core Plus Fund (HABDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSTRX achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly higher than HABDX's 0.88% return. Over the past 10 years, HSTRX has outperformed HABDX with an annualized return of 5.11%, while HABDX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.29% annualized return.


HSTRX

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.29%
YTD
3.66%
6M
3.57%
1Y
13.61%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
5.79%
10Y*
5.11%

HABDX

1D
0.30%
1M
0.94%
YTD
0.88%
6M
0.98%
1Y
5.17%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
2.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSTRX vs. HABDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HSTRX
Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund
3.66%20.33%6.06%6.04%-6.23%1.21%11.45%11.42%1.48%1.21%
HABDX
Harbor Core Plus Fund
0.88%7.28%2.56%6.70%-13.23%-0.64%8.88%8.42%-0.20%4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between HSTRX and HABDX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2002

0.48

The correlation between HSTRX and HABDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.59 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSTRX vs. HABDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSTRX
HSTRX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HSTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HSTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

HABDX
HABDX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
HABDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HABDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
HABDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
HABDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
HABDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSTRX vs. HABDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund (HSTRX) and Harbor Core Plus Fund (HABDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HSTRXHABDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.26

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.65

1.94

+3.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.62

5.56

+9.06

HSTRX vs. HABDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSTRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the HABDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSTRX and HABDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HSTRX vs. HABDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSTRX drawdown since its inception was -13.53%, smaller than the maximum HABDX drawdown of -17.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSTRX and HABDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSTRXHABDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.53%

-17.94%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.42%

-2.73%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.24%

-6.15%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.53%

-17.94%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.53%

-17.94%

+4.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-1.03%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-1.86%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.95%

-0.02%

Volatility

HSTRX vs. HABDX - Volatility Comparison

Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund (HSTRX) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to Harbor Core Plus Fund (HABDX) at 1.11%. This indicates that HSTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HABDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSTRXHABDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

1.11%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.59%

2.68%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.98%

3.66%

+1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.41%

5.68%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.90%

4.83%

+1.07%

HSTRX vs. HABDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSTRX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HABDX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSTRX vs. HABDX - Dividend Comparison

HSTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than HABDX's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HABDX
Harbor Core Plus Fund
4.69%4.65%4.46%4.24%3.41%3.12%3.27%3.19%3.08%3.41%3.86%5.40%
HSTRX
Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund
2.37%2.25%2.91%2.54%2.15%1.33%0.52%1.29%1.20%0.37%0.25%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSTRX and HABDX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HSTRX has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to HABDX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSTRX dropped -13.53% vs HABDX's -17.94%.

HSTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSTRX and HABDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer