HSTRX vs. HABDX
HSTRX (Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund) and HABDX (Harbor Core Plus Fund) are both mutual funds - HSTRX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Hussman Funds, while HABDX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Harbor. Over the past 10 years, HSTRX returned 5.11%/yr vs 2.29%/yr for HABDX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HSTRX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for HABDX.
Performance
HSTRX vs. HABDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSTRX achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly higher than HABDX's 0.88% return. Over the past 10 years, HSTRX has outperformed HABDX with an annualized return of 5.11%, while HABDX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.29% annualized return.
HSTRX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 13.61%
- 3Y*
- 11.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.79%
- 10Y*
- 5.11%
HABDX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 5.17%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- 0.58%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
HSTRX vs. HABDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSTRX Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund | 3.66% | 20.33% | 6.06% | 6.04% | -6.23% | 1.21% | 11.45% | 11.42% | 1.48% | 1.21% |
HABDX Harbor Core Plus Fund | 0.88% | 7.28% | 2.56% | 6.70% | -13.23% | -0.64% | 8.88% | 8.42% | -0.20% | 4.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSTRX and HABDX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2002 | 0.48 |
The correlation between HSTRX and HABDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.59 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSTRX vs. HABDX — Risk / Return Rank
HSTRX
HABDX
HSTRX vs. HABDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund (HSTRX) and Harbor Core Plus Fund (HABDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HSTRX | HABDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.26 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.65 | 1.94 | +3.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.62 | 5.56 | +9.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HSTRX vs. HABDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSTRX drawdown since its inception was -13.53%, smaller than the maximum HABDX drawdown of -17.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSTRX and HABDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSTRX | HABDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.53% | -17.94% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.42% | -2.73% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.24% | -6.15% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.53% | -17.94% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.53% | -17.94% | +4.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | -1.03% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -1.86% | -0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.95% | -0.02% |
Volatility
HSTRX vs. HABDX - Volatility Comparison
Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund (HSTRX) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to Harbor Core Plus Fund (HABDX) at 1.11%. This indicates that HSTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HABDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSTRX | HABDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | 1.11% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.59% | 2.68% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.98% | 3.66% | +1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.41% | 5.68% | +0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.90% | 4.83% | +1.07% |
HSTRX vs. HABDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSTRX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HABDX's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
HSTRX vs. HABDX - Dividend Comparison
HSTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than HABDX's 4.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HABDX Harbor Core Plus Fund | 4.69% | 4.65% | 4.46% | 4.24% | 3.41% | 3.12% | 3.27% | 3.19% | 3.08% | 3.41% | 3.86% | 5.40% |
HSTRX Hussman Strategic Total Return Fund | 2.37% | 2.25% | 2.91% | 2.54% | 2.15% | 1.33% | 0.52% | 1.29% | 1.20% | 0.37% | 0.25% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSTRX and HABDX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HSTRX has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to HABDX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSTRX dropped -13.53% vs HABDX's -17.94%.
HSTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HSTRX and HABDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer