HQH vs. ARCC
Compare and contrast key facts about Tekla Healthcare Investors (HQH) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).
Performance
HQH vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HQH vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HQH Tekla Healthcare Investors | -0.42% | 34.12% | 10.22% | 1.22% | -17.27% | 7.99% | 24.82% | 26.80% | -13.08% | 15.97% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | -9.97% | 1.07% | 19.78% | 20.03% | -3.84% | 36.14% | 0.86% | 31.30% | 8.81% | 4.50% |
Fundamentals
HQH:
$21.06M
ARCC:
$1.88B
HQH:
$21.06M
ARCC:
$1.18B
HQH:
$0.00
ARCC:
$1.08B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HQH achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's -9.97% return. Over the past 10 years, HQH has underperformed ARCC with an annualized return of 6.86%, while ARCC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.74% annualized return.
HQH
- 1D
- 2.75%
- 1M
- -3.18%
- YTD
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 4.66%
- 1Y
- 31.01%
- 3Y*
- 14.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.86%
ARCC
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- -9.97%
- 6M
- -7.39%
- 1Y
- -12.64%
- 3Y*
- 8.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HQH vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank
HQH
ARCC
HQH vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tekla Healthcare Investors (HQH) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HQH | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | -0.54 | +1.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.83 | -0.63 | +2.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.92 | +0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | -0.63 | +2.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.04 | -1.29 | +8.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HQH | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | -0.54 | +1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.42 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.46 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between HQH and ARCC is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HQH vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison
HQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.31%, more than ARCC's 10.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HQH Tekla Healthcare Investors | 12.31% | 11.56% | 14.21% | 9.66% | 9.50% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 8.24% | 10.75% | 8.78% | 9.80% | 11.97% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 10.83% | 9.49% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% |
Drawdowns
HQH vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HQH drawdown since its inception was -62.36%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HQH and ARCC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HQH | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.36% | -79.36% | +17.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.01% | -19.35% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.55% | -21.76% | -15.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.55% | -56.77% | +19.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.82% | -18.05% | +10.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.13% | -9.07% | -12.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 9.40% | -5.44% |
Volatility
HQH vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison
Tekla Healthcare Investors (HQH) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 6.78%. This indicates that HQH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HQH | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.58% | 6.78% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.02% | 15.24% | +0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.44% | 23.54% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.47% | 19.89% | -0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 25.53% | -3.88% |
Financials
HQH vs. ARCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tekla Healthcare Investors and Ares Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities