HLIF.TO vs. XYLP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A (HLIF.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF (XYLP.L).
HLIF.TO and XYLP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HLIF.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Jun 8, 2022. XYLP.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite 15% WHT Index. It was launched on Jul 11, 2023.
Performance
HLIF.TO vs. XYLP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HLIF.TO vs. XYLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HLIF.TO Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A | 8.54% | 25.43% | 17.21% | 1.92% |
XYLP.L Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF | -1.40% | 1.40% | 27.10% | 1.14% |
Different Trading Currencies
HLIF.TO is traded in CAD, while XYLP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XYLP.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLIF.TO achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly higher than XYLP.L's -1.40% return.
HLIF.TO
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 8.54%
- 6M
- 16.08%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XYLP.L
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -1.40%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 4.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HLIF.TO vs. XYLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HLIF.TO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLP.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HLIF.TO vs. XYLP.L — Risk / Return Rank
HLIF.TO
XYLP.L
HLIF.TO vs. XYLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A (HLIF.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF (XYLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLIF.TO | XYLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.42 | 0.33 | +3.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.29 | 0.52 | +3.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.79 | 1.08 | +0.70 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 0.36 | +3.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.88 | 1.37 | +22.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLIF.TO | XYLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.42 | 0.33 | +3.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 0.89 | +0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between HLIF.TO and XYLP.L is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HLIF.TO vs. XYLP.L - Dividend Comparison
HLIF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%, less than XYLP.L's 8.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLIF.TO Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A | 5.56% | 6.26% | 7.33% | 7.96% | 3.91% |
XYLP.L Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF | 8.04% | 9.01% | 6.22% | 3.98% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HLIF.TO vs. XYLP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLIF.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.12%, smaller than the maximum XYLP.L drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLIF.TO and XYLP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLIF.TO | XYLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.12% | -19.30% | +8.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.48% | -8.89% | +0.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -7.44% | +6.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.10% | -5.02% | +2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.38% | 2.80% | -1.42% |
Volatility
HLIF.TO vs. XYLP.L - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A (HLIF.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF (XYLP.L) have volatilities of 3.11% and 3.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HLIF.TO | XYLP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.11% | 3.22% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.47% | 6.41% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.54% | 13.40% | -3.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.58% | 10.86% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.58% | 10.86% | -0.28% |