PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HLIF.TO vs. ENCC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

HLIF.TO vs. ENCC.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A (HLIF.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO).

HLIF.TO and ENCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HLIF.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Jun 8, 2022. ENCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Apr 11, 2011.

Performance

HLIF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A (HLIF.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HLIF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HLIF.TO
Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A		8.54%25.43%17.21%6.13%-2.86%
ENCC.TO
Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF		21.92%13.13%17.39%5.72%-11.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLIF.TO achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly lower than ENCC.TO's 21.92% return.

HLIF.TO

1D
0.63%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
8.54%
6M
16.08%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

ENCC.TO

1D
-1.79%
1M
7.40%
YTD
21.92%
6M
23.18%
1Y
30.35%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
27.08%
10Y*
9.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A

Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF

Often compared with HLIF.TO:
HLIF.TO vs. HDIV.TOHLIF.TO vs. AMAX.TOHLIF.TO vs. HYLD-U.TOHLIF.TO vs. CRCY.TOHLIF.TO vs. JEPI.TOHLIF.TO vs. QMAX.TOHLIF.TO vs. CANY.TO
Often compared with ENCC.TO:
ENCC.TO vs. ENCL.TOENCC.TO vs. EMAX.TOENCC.TO vs. ZEOENCC.TO vs. HMAX.TOENCC.TO vs. XDIV.TOENCC.TO vs. XEQT.TOENCC.TO vs. ENS.TO

HLIF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HLIF.TO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ENCC.TO's 0.76% expense ratio.

HLIF.TO
Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A
ENCC.TO
Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF

Return for Risk

HLIF.TO vs. ENCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HLIF.TO
HLIF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HLIF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLIF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLIF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
HLIF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLIF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO
ENCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLIF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A (HLIF.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HLIF.TOENCC.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.42

1.76

+1.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.29

2.16

+2.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

1.37

+0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

1.89

+1.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.88

7.61

+16.27

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HLIF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLIF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.42, which is higher than the ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLIF.TO and ENCC.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HLIF.TOENCC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.42

1.76

+1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

1.17

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.32

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

0.00

+1.33

Correlation

The correlation between HLIF.TO and ENCC.TO is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HLIF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

HLIF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%, less than ENCC.TO's 10.46% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLIF.TO
Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A		5.56%6.26%7.33%7.96%3.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ENCC.TO
Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF		10.46%13.62%14.58%14.87%12.55%4.23%5.10%6.09%8.35%6.92%4.77%15.15%

Drawdowns

HLIF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLIF.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.12%, smaller than the maximum ENCC.TO drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLIF.TO and ENCC.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

HLIF.TOENCC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.12%

-89.91%

+78.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-16.61%

+8.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-25.57%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-82.16%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-1.87%

+1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-40.25%

+38.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

4.13%

-2.75%

Volatility

HLIF.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A (HLIF.TO) is 3.11%, while Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that HLIF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

HLIF.TOENCC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

3.50%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.47%

9.78%

-4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.54%

17.36%

-7.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.58%

23.28%

-12.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.58%

29.05%

-18.47%