HIX vs. CCLFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Western Asset High Income Fund II (HIX) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX).
HIX is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the . It was launched on May 28, 1998. CCLFX is managed by Cliffwater. It was launched on Mar 6, 2019.
Performance
HIX vs. CCLFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HIX vs. CCLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIX Western Asset High Income Fund II | -0.88% | 13.56% | -1.32% | 15.72% | -24.60% | 13.02% | 12.36% | 7.53% |
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 0.96% | 8.93% | 12.62% | 12.66% | 2.32% | 10.38% | 8.73% | 2.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIX achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly lower than CCLFX's 0.96% return.
HIX
- 1D
- 5.57%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- -0.88%
- 6M
- -1.81%
- 1Y
- 9.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.57%
- 5Y*
- 1.20%
- 10Y*
- 5.73%
CCLFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 7.64%
- 3Y*
- 10.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HIX vs. CCLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIX has a 3.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CCLFX's 3.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HIX vs. CCLFX — Risk / Return Rank
HIX
CCLFX
HIX vs. CCLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset High Income Fund II (HIX) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.64 | 8.00 | -7.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.95 | 16.02 | -15.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 5.88 | -4.74 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 16.71 | -15.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.10 | 101.68 | -98.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 8.00 | -7.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 5.17 | -5.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 4.54 | -4.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between HIX and CCLFX is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HIX vs. CCLFX - Dividend Comparison
HIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.77%, more than CCLFX's 10.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIX Western Asset High Income Fund II | 14.77% | 14.13% | 13.95% | 11.85% | 12.15% | 8.21% | 8.53% | 8.28% | 9.50% | 8.73% | 10.53% | 13.12% |
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 10.37% | 10.47% | 11.27% | 10.96% | 3.96% | 7.03% | 6.90% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HIX vs. CCLFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIX drawdown since its inception was -61.03%, which is greater than CCLFX's maximum drawdown of -3.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIX and CCLFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.03% | -3.91% | -57.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.07% | -0.46% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.75% | -2.25% | -36.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.38% | -0.09% | -7.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.94% | -0.16% | -8.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 0.08% | +2.83% |
Volatility
HIX vs. CCLFX - Volatility Comparison
Western Asset High Income Fund II (HIX) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) at 0.32%. This indicates that HIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HIX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 0.32% | +7.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.78% | 0.65% | +10.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.12% | 0.97% | +14.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 1.74% | +15.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 1.89% | +16.21% |