HIWS.L vs. MWOZ.L
Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (HIWS.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L).
HIWS.L and MWOZ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HIWS.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Islamic Universal Screened Select Index. It was launched on Dec 9, 2022. MWOZ.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Nov 22, 2024. Both HIWS.L and MWOZ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HIWS.L vs. MWOZ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HIWS.L vs. MWOZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HIWS.L HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc | 1.03% | 9.54% |
MWOZ.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist | -2.67% | 6.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIWS.L achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly higher than MWOZ.L's -2.67% return.
HIWS.L
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- -3.77%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 6.42%
- 1Y
- 23.00%
- 3Y*
- 11.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MWOZ.L
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- YTD
- -2.67%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 15.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HIWS.L vs. MWOZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HIWS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MWOZ.L's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HIWS.L vs. MWOZ.L — Risk / Return Rank
HIWS.L
MWOZ.L
HIWS.L vs. MWOZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (HIWS.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIWS.L | MWOZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.44 | 1.10 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.05 | 1.56 | +0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.23 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 2.03 | +1.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.20 | 7.65 | +3.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIWS.L | MWOZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 1.10 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.22 | +0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between HIWS.L and MWOZ.L is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HIWS.L vs. MWOZ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither HIWS.L nor MWOZ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
HIWS.L vs. MWOZ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIWS.L drawdown since its inception was -21.14%, which is greater than MWOZ.L's maximum drawdown of -19.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIWS.L and MWOZ.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIWS.L | MWOZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.14% | -19.89% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -10.42% | +0.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -4.87% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -4.41% | +1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 2.07% | +0.01% |
Volatility
HIWS.L vs. MWOZ.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (HIWS.L) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) at 4.30%. This indicates that HIWS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MWOZ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HIWS.L | MWOZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 4.30% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.06% | 8.28% | +1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.94% | 14.34% | +1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 14.60% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 14.60% | -0.97% |