PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HIWS.L vs. JEPG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HIWS.L vs. JEPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (HIWS.L) and JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist (JEPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HIWS.L vs. JEPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HIWS.L
HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.76%13.05%8.10%3.98%
JEPG.L
JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist
2.97%4.39%9.72%0.25%
Different Trading Currencies

HIWS.L is traded in GBP, while JEPG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JEPG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIWS.L achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than JEPG.L's 2.90% return.


HIWS.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
-1.94%
YTD
0.76%
6M
5.04%
1Y
22.91%
3Y*
11.29%
5Y*
10Y*

JEPG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
2.90%
6M
4.88%
1Y
2.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HIWS.L vs. JEPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIWS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HIWS.L vs. JEPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIWS.L
HIWS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HIWS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIWS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIWS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
HIWS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIWS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

JEPG.L
JEPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
JEPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIWS.L vs. JEPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (HIWS.L) and JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist (JEPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HIWS.LJEPG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

0.18

+1.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.05

0.32

+1.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.04

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

0.60

+3.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.97

1.49

+12.48

HIWS.L vs. JEPG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIWS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the JEPG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIWS.L and JEPG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HIWS.LJEPG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

0.18

+1.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.65

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between HIWS.L and JEPG.L is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HIWS.L vs. JEPG.L - Dividend Comparison

HIWS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%.


Drawdowns

HIWS.L vs. JEPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIWS.L drawdown since its inception was -21.14%, which is greater than JEPG.L's maximum drawdown of -8.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIWS.L and JEPG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HIWS.LJEPG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.14%

-7.92%

-13.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-7.59%

+0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.60%

-4.46%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-1.35%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

1.96%

+0.06%

Volatility

HIWS.L vs. JEPG.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (HIWS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist (JEPG.L) at 4.28%. This indicates that HIWS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HIWS.LJEPG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

4.28%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

7.22%

+2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

12.45%

+3.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.63%

11.46%

+2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.63%

11.46%

+2.17%