PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HIU.TO vs. ZSP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

HIU.TO vs. ZSP.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BetaPro S&P 500 Daily Inverse ETF (HIU.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO).

HIU.TO and ZSP.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HIU.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Feb 3, 2010. ZSP.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Nov 14, 2012. Both HIU.TO and ZSP.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

HIU.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro S&P 500 Daily Inverse ETF (HIU.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HIU.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HIU.TO
BetaPro S&P 500 Daily Inverse ETF		8.11%-13.79%-14.77%-15.60%19.13%-24.53%-24.80%-23.55%4.26%-18.72%
ZSP.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF		-3.17%12.02%35.07%23.30%-12.68%27.53%15.61%24.69%3.24%13.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIU.TO achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly higher than ZSP.TO's -3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, HIU.TO has underperformed ZSP.TO with an annualized return of -12.48%, while ZSP.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.40% annualized return.

HIU.TO

1D
0.39%
1M
8.33%
YTD
8.11%
6M
5.99%
1Y
-11.39%
3Y*
-10.68%
5Y*
-8.37%
10Y*
-12.48%

ZSP.TO

1D
2.73%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
-3.17%
6M
-2.25%
1Y
13.31%
3Y*
18.98%
5Y*
13.70%
10Y*
14.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BetaPro S&P 500 Daily Inverse ETF

BMO S&P 500 Index ETF

Often compared with HIU.TO:
HIU.TO vs. HDIV.TOHIU.TO vs. EQLI.TOHIU.TO vs. ESG.TOHIU.TO vs. VSP.TOHIU.TO vs. XSP.TOHIU.TO vs. VFV.TOHIU.TO vs. HXS.TO
Often compared with ZSP.TO:
ZSP.TO vs. XSP.TOZSP.TO vs. VOOZSP.TO vs. ZCN.TOZSP.TO vs. XUS.TOZSP.TO vs. VSP.TOZSP.TO vs. ZEQT.TOZSP.TO vs. ZQQ.TO

HIU.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HIU.TO has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ZSP.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.

HIU.TO
BetaPro S&P 500 Daily Inverse ETF
ZSP.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF

Return for Risk

HIU.TO vs. ZSP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HIU.TO
HIU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
HIU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HIU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO
ZSP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ZSP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HIU.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro S&P 500 Daily Inverse ETF (HIU.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HIU.TOZSP.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.66

0.73

-1.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.83

1.10

-1.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.17

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

1.17

-1.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.44

4.37

-4.81

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HIU.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HIU.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the ZSP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIU.TO and ZSP.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HIU.TOZSP.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.66

0.73

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.50

0.92

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.69

0.88

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.75

1.08

-1.83

Correlation

The correlation between HIU.TO and ZSP.TO is -0.76. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

HIU.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Dividend Comparison

HIU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZSP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIU.TO
BetaPro S&P 500 Daily Inverse ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZSP.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF		0.87%0.82%0.94%1.33%1.44%1.15%1.44%1.47%1.63%1.63%2.20%1.53%

Drawdowns

HIU.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIU.TO drawdown since its inception was -91.37%, which is greater than ZSP.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIU.TO and ZSP.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

HIU.TOZSP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.37%

-26.94%

-64.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.20%

-12.43%

-15.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.31%

-22.25%

-21.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.72%

-26.94%

-49.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.49%

-6.12%

-84.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.08%

-3.37%

-62.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.81%

3.33%

+19.48%

Volatility

HIU.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BetaPro S&P 500 Daily Inverse ETF (HIU.TO) is 4.27%, while BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that HIU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZSP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

HIU.TOZSP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

5.16%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.26%

9.35%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.22%

18.36%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

14.97%

+1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

16.37%

+1.74%