HIFS vs. APH
Compare and contrast key facts about Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) and Amphenol Corporation (APH).
Performance
HIFS vs. APH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HIFS vs. APH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIFS Hingham Institution for Savings | 1.16% | 12.82% | 31.87% | -28.60% | -33.55% | 95.96% | 4.68% | 7.17% | -3.84% | 5.93% |
APH Amphenol Corporation | -6.32% | 96.08% | 41.30% | 31.85% | -11.96% | 35.25% | 22.09% | 34.91% | -6.82% | 31.81% |
Fundamentals
HIFS:
$630.85M
APH:
$162.83B
HIFS:
$24.75
APH:
$3.34
HIFS:
11.55
APH:
37.88
HIFS:
1.90
APH:
1.26
HIFS:
2.66
APH:
7.00
HIFS:
1.32
APH:
12.14
HIFS:
$236.75M
APH:
$23.09B
HIFS:
$68.31M
APH:
$8.52B
HIFS:
$73.34M
APH:
$6.89B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIFS achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly higher than APH's -6.32% return. Over the past 10 years, HIFS has underperformed APH with an annualized return of 10.16%, while APH has yielded a comparatively higher 25.30% annualized return.
HIFS
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 9.13%
- 1Y
- 21.67%
- 3Y*
- 8.30%
- 5Y*
- 1.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
APH
- 1D
- 6.04%
- 1M
- -13.32%
- YTD
- -6.32%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- 94.00%
- 3Y*
- 46.92%
- 5Y*
- 31.66%
- 10Y*
- 25.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HIFS vs. APH — Risk / Return Rank
HIFS
APH
HIFS vs. APH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HIFS | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | 2.30 | -1.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.95 | 2.65 | -1.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.40 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 3.23 | -2.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.11 | 11.34 | -9.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HIFS | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 2.30 | -1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 1.08 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.93 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.62 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between HIFS and APH is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HIFS vs. APH - Dividend Comparison
HIFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than APH's 0.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIFS Hingham Institution for Savings | 1.13% | 0.89% | 0.74% | 1.30% | 1.10% | 0.67% | 1.61% | 0.73% | 0.70% | 0.63% | 0.62% | 1.79% |
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.66% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 1.07% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
HIFS vs. APH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIFS drawdown since its inception was -64.79%, roughly equal to the maximum APH drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIFS and APH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HIFS | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.79% | -63.41% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.45% | -28.19% | +7.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.79% | -28.73% | -36.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.79% | -37.56% | -27.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.45% | -23.85% | -6.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.53% | -13.55% | -1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.75% | 8.03% | +1.72% |
Volatility
HIFS vs. APH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) is 7.49%, while Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a volatility of 14.30%. This indicates that HIFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HIFS | APH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.49% | 14.30% | -6.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.41% | 33.98% | +2.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.31% | 41.10% | +5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.14% | 29.47% | +8.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.27% | 27.16% | +7.11% |
Financials
HIFS vs. APH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hingham Institution for Savings and Amphenol Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HIFS vs. APH - Profitability Comparison
HIFS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hingham Institution for Savings reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 66.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
APH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.46B and revenue of 6.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.2%.
HIFS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hingham Institution for Savings reported an operating income of 27.00M and revenue of 66.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 40.4%.
APH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported an operating income of 1.77B and revenue of 6.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.5%.
HIFS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hingham Institution for Savings reported a net income of 20.72M and revenue of 66.85M, resulting in a net margin of 31.0%.
APH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Amphenol Corporation reported a net income of 1.20B and revenue of 6.44B, resulting in a net margin of 18.6%.