HIFS vs. APH
Compare and contrast key facts about Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) and Amphenol Corporation (APH).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HIFS or APH.
Correlation
The correlation between HIFS and APH is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
HIFS vs. APH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HIFS:
0.89
APH:
1.76
HIFS:
1.54
APH:
2.12
HIFS:
1.18
APH:
1.33
HIFS:
0.56
APH:
2.71
HIFS:
3.02
APH:
8.87
HIFS:
11.64%
APH:
5.22%
HIFS:
39.64%
APH:
26.38%
HIFS:
-64.79%
APH:
-63.41%
HIFS:
-38.03%
APH:
-6.12%
Fundamentals
HIFS:
$583.96M
APH:
$89.53B
HIFS:
$10.55
APH:
$1.75
HIFS:
25.39
APH:
42.43
HIFS:
0.00
APH:
2.32
HIFS:
$173.13M
APH:
$14.23B
HIFS:
$249.07M
APH:
$4.76B
HIFS:
$30.24M
APH:
$3.50B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HIFS achieves a 34.09% return, which is significantly lower than APH's 43.60% return. Over the past 10 years, HIFS has underperformed APH with an annualized return of 13.48%, while APH has yielded a comparatively higher 18.85% annualized return.
HIFS
34.09%
-3.52%
57.41%
30.23%
6.13%
13.48%
APH
43.60%
-0.22%
3.19%
44.83%
22.61%
18.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HIFS vs. APH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HIFS vs. APH - Dividend Comparison
HIFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than APH's 0.78% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIFS Hingham Institution for Savings | 0.98% | 1.30% | 1.10% | 0.67% | 1.61% | 0.97% | 0.87% | 0.78% | 0.77% | 1.79% | 1.57% | 1.68% |
APH Amphenol Corporation | 0.78% | 0.86% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 1.01% | 0.84% | 0.68% |
Drawdowns
HIFS vs. APH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HIFS drawdown since its inception was -64.79%, roughly equal to the maximum APH drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIFS and APH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HIFS vs. APH - Volatility Comparison
Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to Amphenol Corporation (APH) at 8.16%. This indicates that HIFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
HIFS vs. APH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hingham Institution for Savings and Amphenol Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities