PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HIFS vs. APH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between HIFS and APH is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.1

Performance

HIFS vs. APH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

10,000.00%20,000.00%30,000.00%40,000.00%50,000.00%60,000.00%70,000.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
11,039.36%
54,918.62%
HIFS
APH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HIFS:

0.76

APH:

0.10

Sortino Ratio

HIFS:

1.38

APH:

0.35

Omega Ratio

HIFS:

1.16

APH:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

HIFS:

0.48

APH:

0.14

Martin Ratio

HIFS:

2.83

APH:

0.39

Ulcer Index

HIFS:

10.34%

APH:

8.71%

Daily Std Dev

HIFS:

38.45%

APH:

34.55%

Max Drawdown

HIFS:

-64.79%

APH:

-63.42%

Current Drawdown

HIFS:

-47.03%

APH:

-24.58%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HIFS:

$583.96M

APH:

$71.56B

EPS

HIFS:

$10.55

APH:

$1.92

PE Ratio

HIFS:

25.39

APH:

30.78

PEG Ratio

HIFS:

0.00

APH:

2.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

HIFS:

$89.19M

APH:

$11.97B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HIFS:

$165.12M

APH:

$4.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

HIFS:

$13.67M

APH:

$2.99B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HIFS achieves a -13.07% return, which is significantly higher than APH's -14.70% return. Over the past 10 years, HIFS has underperformed APH with an annualized return of 9.57%, while APH has yielded a comparatively higher 16.07% annualized return.


HIFS

YTD

-13.07%

1M

-8.94%

6M

-4.56%

1Y

30.01%

5Y*

11.52%

10Y*

9.57%

APH

YTD

-14.70%

1M

-8.45%

6M

-4.85%

1Y

3.60%

5Y*

29.46%

10Y*

16.07%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HIFS vs. APH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HIFS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HIFS is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HIFS is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HIFS is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HIFS is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HIFS is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HIFS is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

APH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of APH is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of APH is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of APH is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of APH is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of APH is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of APH is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HIFS vs. APH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) and Amphenol Corporation (APH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HIFS, currently valued at 0.76, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.00
HIFS: 0.76
APH: 0.10
The chart of Sortino ratio for HIFS, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
HIFS: 1.38
APH: 0.35
The chart of Omega ratio for HIFS, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
HIFS: 1.16
APH: 1.05
The chart of Calmar ratio for HIFS, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
HIFS: 0.48
APH: 0.14
The chart of Martin ratio for HIFS, currently valued at 2.83, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00
HIFS: 2.83
APH: 0.39

The current HIFS Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the APH Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HIFS and APH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.76
0.10
HIFS
APH

Dividends

HIFS vs. APH - Dividend Comparison

HIFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than APH's 1.02% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HIFS
Hingham Institution for Savings
1.14%0.74%1.30%1.10%0.67%1.61%0.97%0.87%0.78%0.77%1.79%1.57%
APH
Amphenol Corporation
1.02%0.79%0.86%1.06%0.73%0.80%0.89%1.09%0.80%0.86%1.01%0.84%

Drawdowns

HIFS vs. APH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HIFS drawdown since its inception was -64.79%, roughly equal to the maximum APH drawdown of -63.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HIFS and APH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-47.03%
-24.58%
HIFS
APH

Volatility

HIFS vs. APH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS) is 10.30%, while Amphenol Corporation (APH) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that HIFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
10.30%
14.18%
HIFS
APH

Financials

HIFS vs. APH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hingham Institution for Savings and Amphenol Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab