PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HHIH.TO vs. ZWU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

HHIH.TO vs. ZWU.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Harvest High Income Equity Shares ETF Class A Units (HHIH.TO) and BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU.TO).

HHIH.TO and ZWU.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HHIH.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Aug 15, 2025. ZWU.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011.

Performance

HHIH.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest High Income Equity Shares ETF Class A Units (HHIH.TO) and BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HHIH.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
HHIH.TO
Harvest High Income Equity Shares ETF Class A Units		-7.69%5.92%
ZWU.TO
BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF		11.36%0.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HHIH.TO achieves a -7.69% return, which is significantly lower than ZWU.TO's 11.36% return.

HHIH.TO

1D
1.40%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
-7.69%
6M
-9.31%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

ZWU.TO

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.08%
YTD
11.36%
6M
9.50%
1Y
16.65%
3Y*
10.49%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
6.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Harvest High Income Equity Shares ETF Class A Units

BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF

Often compared with HHIH.TO:
HHIH.TO vs. ENCL.TOHHIH.TO vs. HDIF.TOHHIH.TO vs. HHIS.TOHHIH.TO vs. HUTE.TOHHIH.TO vs. BKCC.TOHHIH.TO vs. BKCL.TOHHIH.TO vs. ECHI.TO
Often compared with ZWU.TO:
ZWU.TO vs. ZUT.TOZWU.TO vs. UMAX.TOZWU.TO vs. UTES.TOZWU.TO vs. ZWC.TOZWU.TO vs. PAYF.TOZWU.TO vs. SYLD.TOZWU.TO vs. VDY.TO

HHIH.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HHIH.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ZWU.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

ZWU.TO
BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF
HHIH.TO
Harvest High Income Equity Shares ETF Class A Units

Return for Risk

HHIH.TO vs. ZWU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HHIH.TO
ZWU.TO
ZWU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ZWU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HHIH.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest High Income Equity Shares ETF Class A Units (HHIH.TO) and BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HHIH.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HHIH.TOZWU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

1.84

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.69

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.46

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.17

0.43

-0.60

Correlation

The correlation between HHIH.TO and ZWU.TO is -0.28. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

HHIH.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Dividend Comparison

HHIH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.75%, more than ZWU.TO's 6.94% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HHIH.TO
Harvest High Income Equity Shares ETF Class A Units		12.75%6.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZWU.TO
BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF		6.94%7.59%7.96%8.54%8.35%7.43%7.94%6.29%6.84%6.46%6.77%7.57%

Drawdowns

HHIH.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HHIH.TO drawdown since its inception was -19.68%, smaller than the maximum ZWU.TO drawdown of -37.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHIH.TO and ZWU.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

HHIH.TOZWU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.68%

-37.41%

+17.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-6.71%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-23.36%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-37.41%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.17%

-0.65%

-14.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.94%

-5.42%

-1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

1.80%

—

Volatility

HHIH.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

HHIH.TOZWU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

2.44%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

5.27%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.26%

9.11%

+12.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.26%

10.34%

+10.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.26%

14.15%

+7.11%