HGGG.TO vs. HHIC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF (HGGG.TO) and Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF (HHIC.TO).
HGGG.TO and HHIC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HGGG.TO is a passively managed fund by Harvest that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Gold Giants Index TR. It was launched on Jan 10, 2019. HHIC.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Aug 19, 2025.
Performance
HGGG.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HGGG.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HGGG.TO Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF | 6.31% | 58.23% |
HHIC.TO Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF | 9.05% | 16.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HGGG.TO achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than HHIC.TO's 9.05% return.
HGGG.TO
- 1D
- 8.03%
- 1M
- -20.27%
- YTD
- 6.31%
- 6M
- 25.64%
- 1Y
- 117.42%
- 3Y*
- 50.08%
- 5Y*
- 30.21%
- 10Y*
- —
HHIC.TO
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 6M
- 15.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HGGG.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HGGG.TO and HHIC.TO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Return for Risk
HGGG.TO vs. HHIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HGGG.TO
HHIC.TO
HGGG.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF (HGGG.TO) and Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF (HHIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HGGG.TO | HHIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.71 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.98 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.18 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HGGG.TO | HHIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 2.79 | -2.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between HGGG.TO and HHIC.TO is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HGGG.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Dividend Comparison
HGGG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HHIC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.85%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HGGG.TO Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.54% | 2.65% | 0.54% |
HHIC.TO Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF | 6.85% | 4.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HGGG.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HGGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -51.54%, which is greater than HHIC.TO's maximum drawdown of -7.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HGGG.TO and HHIC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HGGG.TO | HHIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.54% | -7.26% | -44.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.29% | -4.18% | -16.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.15% | -1.31% | -18.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.37% | — | — |
Volatility
HGGG.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HGGG.TO | HHIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.54% | 17.25% | +26.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.91% | 17.25% | +14.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.34% | 17.25% | +15.09% |