PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFSAX vs. TFAQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFSAX vs. TFAQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class (HFSAX) and TFA Quantitative Fund (TFAQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFSAX achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly lower than TFAQX's 10.10% return.


HFSAX

1D
0.33%
1M
0.16%
YTD
1.71%
6M
1.66%
1Y
10.14%
3Y*
9.07%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
8.29%

TFAQX

1D
1.97%
1M
3.24%
YTD
10.10%
6M
8.89%
1Y
26.99%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFSAX vs. TFAQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HFSAX
Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class
1.71%11.97%3.75%10.93%-9.44%9.05%30.73%
TFAQX
TFA Quantitative Fund
10.10%11.41%22.12%23.25%-25.11%10.88%18.19%

Correlation

The correlation between HFSAX and TFAQX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020

0.63

The correlation between HFSAX and TFAQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFSAX vs. TFAQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFSAX
HFSAX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HFSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
HFSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

TFAQX
TFAQX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
TFAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TFAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFSAX vs. TFAQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class (HFSAX) and TFA Quantitative Fund (TFAQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HFSAXTFAQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.30

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.10

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.51

7.11

+0.40

HFSAX vs. TFAQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFSAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the TFAQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFSAX and TFAQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HFSAX vs. TFAQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFSAX drawdown since its inception was -12.81%, smaller than the maximum TFAQX drawdown of -27.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFSAX and TFAQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFSAXTFAQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.81%

-27.78%

+14.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.68%

-12.85%

+9.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.67%

-21.59%

+15.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.16%

-27.78%

+15.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-0.40%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.38%

-8.44%

+6.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

3.78%

-2.44%

Volatility

HFSAX vs. TFAQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class (HFSAX) is 1.72%, while TFA Quantitative Fund (TFAQX) has a volatility of 7.12%. This indicates that HFSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TFAQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFSAXTFAQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

7.12%

-5.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.84%

12.59%

-8.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.74%

16.20%

-11.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.21%

17.61%

-11.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.27%

17.43%

-11.16%

HFSAX vs. TFAQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFSAX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TFAQX's 1.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFSAX vs. TFAQX - Dividend Comparison

HFSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.58%, more than TFAQX's 9.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFSAX
Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class
9.58%9.75%5.87%5.17%4.92%10.98%13.58%6.44%3.11%11.06%5.60%1.85%
TFAQX
TFA Quantitative Fund
9.23%10.16%0.00%0.03%5.06%20.52%4.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFSAX and TFAQX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFAQX has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to HFSAX (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFSAX dropped -12.81% vs TFAQX's -27.78%.

HFSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFSAX and TFAQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer