HDLG.L vs. S5SD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L).
HDLG.L and S5SD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HDLG.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. It was launched on May 11, 2015. S5SD.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Mar 25, 2019. Both HDLG.L and S5SD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HDLG.L vs. S5SD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HDLG.L vs. S5SD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HDLG.L Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF | 5.52% | 4.22% |
S5SD.L UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis | -5.61% | 27.97% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDLG.L achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly higher than S5SD.L's -5.61% return.
HDLG.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -3.49%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 6M
- 4.79%
- 1Y
- 0.19%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.47%
- 10Y*
- 7.39%
S5SD.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- -5.61%
- 6M
- -0.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HDLG.L vs. S5SD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDLG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than S5SD.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HDLG.L vs. S5SD.L — Risk / Return Rank
HDLG.L
S5SD.L
HDLG.L vs. S5SD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLG.L) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDLG.L | S5SD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.01 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.11 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDLG.L | S5SD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 1.93 | -1.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between HDLG.L and S5SD.L is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HDLG.L vs. S5SD.L - Dividend Comparison
HDLG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, while S5SD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDLG.L Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF | 3.69% | 3.93% | 3.46% | 4.12% | 3.49% | 3.30% | 4.65% | 3.77% | 3.67% | 3.18% | 2.88% | 1.86% |
S5SD.L UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HDLG.L vs. S5SD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDLG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.75%, which is greater than S5SD.L's maximum drawdown of -7.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDLG.L and S5SD.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDLG.L | S5SD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.75% | -7.32% | -26.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.07% | -7.00% | +2.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.31% | -1.31% | -5.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.52% | — | — |
Volatility
HDLG.L vs. S5SD.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HDLG.L | S5SD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.48% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.26% | 11.71% | +1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.96% | 11.71% | +1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 11.71% | +3.95% |