HBAL.TO vs. GCNS.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF (HBAL.TO) and iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (GCNS.TO).

HBAL.TO and GCNS.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HBAL.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Aug 1, 2018. GCNS.TO is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Sep 2, 2020.

Performance

HBAL.TO vs. GCNS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF (HBAL.TO) and iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (GCNS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HBAL.TO vs. GCNS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HBAL.TO Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF	-1.33%	13.57%	16.65%	15.57%	-17.70%	14.70%	10.44%
GCNS.TO iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio	-2.08%	7.23%	15.54%	11.66%	-10.94%	8.07%	4.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBAL.TO achieves a -1.33% return, which is significantly higher than GCNS.TO's -2.08% return.

HBAL.TO

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: -4.40%
• YTD: -1.33%
• 6M: 0.70%
• 1Y: 10.97%
• 3Y*: 12.18%
• 5Y*: 6.75%
• 10Y*: —

GCNS.TO

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -4.37%
• YTD: -2.08%
• 6M: -2.07%
• 1Y: 6.64%
• 3Y*: 9.17%
• 5Y*: 5.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBAL.TO vs. GCNS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBAL.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GCNS.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

GCNS.TO

iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio

HBAL.TO

Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF

Return for Risk

HBAL.TO vs. GCNS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBAL.TO

HBAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 63
HBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
HBAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
HBAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 65
HBAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
HBAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 63

GCNS.TO

GCNS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 39
GCNS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
GCNS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
GCNS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 39
GCNS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
GCNS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBAL.TO vs. GCNS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF (HBAL.TO) and iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (GCNS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HBAL.TO	GCNS.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	0.65	+0.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	0.93	+0.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.15	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	1.22	+0.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.41	3.91	+2.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HBAL.TO vs. GCNS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the GCNS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBAL.TO and GCNS.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HBAL.TO	GCNS.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	0.65	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.67	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.74	-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between HBAL.TO and GCNS.TO is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HBAL.TO vs. GCNS.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBAL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than GCNS.TO's 2.16% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HBAL.TO Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF	2.24%	2.41%	2.28%	1.08%	0.02%	0.06%	0.04%	0.19%
GCNS.TO iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio	2.16%	2.07%	2.03%	2.88%	2.09%	1.60%	2.49%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HBAL.TO vs. GCNS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBAL.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.49%, which is greater than GCNS.TO's maximum drawdown of -15.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBAL.TO and GCNS.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBAL.TO	GCNS.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.49%	-15.37%	-7.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.26%	-5.05%	-2.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.11%	-15.37%	-6.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.80%	-4.43%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.61%	-3.65%	-0.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	1.57%	+0.21%

Volatility

HBAL.TO vs. GCNS.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Balanced Asset Allocation ETF (HBAL.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to iShares ESG Conservative Balanced ETF Portfolio (GCNS.TO) at 2.36%. This indicates that HBAL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCNS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBAL.TO	GCNS.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.85%	2.36%	+1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.04%	4.91%	+1.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.58%	9.58%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.46%	8.07%	+2.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.18%	7.80%	+4.38%