HBA.TO vs. CIC.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HBA.TO) and CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO).

HBA.TO and CIC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HBA.TO is a passively managed fund by Hamilton that tracks the performance of the Solactive Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index. It was launched on Jun 26, 2020. CIC.TO is an actively managed fund by CI. It was launched on Aug 18, 2010.

Performance

HBA.TO vs. CIC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HBA.TO) and CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HBA.TO vs. CIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HBA.TO Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF	0.36%	13.01%	30.43%	12.29%	-0.55%	32.18%	20.11%
CIC.TO CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF	1.51%	36.24%	21.30%	6.58%	-10.99%	33.76%	22.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBA.TO achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than CIC.TO's 1.51% return.

HBA.TO

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -8.86%
• YTD: 0.36%
• 6M: 0.66%
• 1Y: 18.74%
• 3Y*: 19.43%
• 5Y*: 13.44%
• 10Y*: —

CIC.TO

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -3.47%
• YTD: 1.51%
• 6M: 12.87%
• 1Y: 42.80%
• 3Y*: 21.09%
• 5Y*: 13.42%
• 10Y*: 11.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBA.TO vs. CIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIC.TO

CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF

Return for Risk

HBA.TO vs. CIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBA.TO

HBA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 54
HBA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
HBA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
HBA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 47
HBA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
HBA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 47

CIC.TO

CIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 98
CIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBA.TO vs. CIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HBA.TO) and CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HBA.TO	CIC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	3.45	-2.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	4.45	-3.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.71	-0.52
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	5.28	-3.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.60	22.30	-17.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HBA.TO vs. CIC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the CIC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBA.TO and CIC.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HBA.TO	CIC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00	3.45	-2.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	1.08	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.01	0.64	+0.37

Correlation

The correlation between HBA.TO and CIC.TO is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HBA.TO vs. CIC.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than CIC.TO's 5.85% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HBA.TO Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF	3.07%	4.11%	4.45%	6.67%	8.56%	5.81%	2.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CIC.TO CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF	5.85%	5.72%	6.71%	7.37%	7.64%	5.48%	9.56%	6.16%	6.61%	5.68%	6.72%	7.31%

Drawdowns

HBA.TO vs. CIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBA.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.15%, smaller than the maximum CIC.TO drawdown of -38.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBA.TO and CIC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBA.TO	CIC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.15%	-38.55%	+17.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.17%	-8.23%	-1.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.15%	-26.34%	+5.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.17%	-5.35%	-4.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.46%	-5.54%	+1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.08%	1.95%	+2.13%

Volatility

HBA.TO vs. CIC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HBA.TO) is 4.78%, while CI Canadian Banks Covered Call Income Class ETF (CIC.TO) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that HBA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBA.TO	CIC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.78%	5.39%	-0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.95%	9.06%	+3.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.91%	12.48%	+6.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.59%	12.56%	+5.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.17%	16.26%	+1.91%