HAWX vs. VEA
HAWX (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - HAWX tracks the MSCI ACWI ex USA 100% Hedged to USD while VEA tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HAWX returned 12.50%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for VEA. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HAWX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
HAWX vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAWX achieves a 16.22% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 13.11% return. Over the past 10 years, HAWX has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 12.50%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.72% annualized return.
HAWX
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 16.22%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 35.93%
- 3Y*
- 21.68%
- 5Y*
- 12.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.50%
VEA
- 1D
- -3.07%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 13.11%
- 6M
- 12.98%
- 1Y
- 30.28%
- 3Y*
- 19.47%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
HAWX vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAWX iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 16.22% | 26.24% | 14.88% | 17.05% | -8.59% | 13.40% | 6.92% | 22.75% | -9.77% | 19.21% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 13.11% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAWX and VEA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2015 | 0.81 |
The correlation between HAWX and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HAWX vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HAWX
VEA
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
HAWX
VEA
Technology
HAWX
VEA
Industrials
HAWX
VEA
Consumer Cyclical
HAWX
VEA
Basic Materials
HAWX
VEA
Healthcare
HAWX
VEA
Communication Services
HAWX
VEA
Consumer Defensive
HAWX
VEA
Energy
HAWX
VEA
Utilities
HAWX
VEA
Real Estate
HAWX
VEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAWX vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
HAWX
VEA
HAWX vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAWX | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.33 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | 2.62 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.87 | 10.06 | +5.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAWX vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAWX drawdown since its inception was -30.63%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAWX and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAWX | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.63% | -60.68% | +30.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -11.63% | +2.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.30% | -13.45% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.47% | -29.71% | +12.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.63% | -35.73% | +5.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | -3.07% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.27% | -13.26% | +8.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 3.02% | -0.75% |
Volatility
HAWX vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) is 6.70%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 7.09%. This indicates that HAWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAWX | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.70% | 7.09% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.61% | 14.74% | -2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.27% | 16.79% | -2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.60% | 16.76% | -3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.27% | 17.21% | -1.94% |
HAWX vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAWX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
HAWX vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
HAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than VEA's 2.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAWX iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 2.41% | 2.80% | 3.31% | 2.95% | 16.94% | 2.63% | 2.00% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.40% | 2.49% | 3.86% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.58% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, HAWX and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VEA has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to HAWX (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAWX dropped -30.63% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 10-year performance, HAWX leads with 12.50% vs 10.72% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, HAWX has been the lower-risk option at 6.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HAWX has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HAWX.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 2.41% for HAWX.
HAWX tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA 100% Hedged to USD, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HAWX and 0.03% for VEA.
HAWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAWX and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer