PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAWX vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAWX vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAWX achieves a 16.22% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 13.11% return. Over the past 10 years, HAWX has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 12.50%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.72% annualized return.


HAWX

1D
-2.87%
1M
2.76%
YTD
16.22%
6M
16.28%
1Y
35.93%
3Y*
21.68%
5Y*
12.75%
10Y*
12.50%

VEA

1D
-3.07%
1M
0.11%
YTD
13.11%
6M
12.98%
1Y
30.28%
3Y*
19.47%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
10.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAWX vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HAWX
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
16.22%26.24%14.88%17.05%-8.59%13.40%6.92%22.75%-9.77%19.21%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
13.11%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between HAWX and VEA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2015

0.81

The correlation between HAWX and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HAWX vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HAWX
VEA

Financial Services

23.2%
22.3%

Technology

22.5%
16.6%

Industrials

14.2%
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
7.4%

Basic Materials

6.9%
7.5%

Healthcare

6.8%
7.6%

Communication Services

4.9%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
5.5%

Energy

4.8%
4.7%

Utilities

3.0%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.4%
2.5%

Financial Services

HAWX
23.2%
VEA
22.3%

Technology

HAWX
22.5%
VEA
16.6%

Industrials

HAWX
14.2%
VEA
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

HAWX
7.5%
VEA
7.4%

Basic Materials

HAWX
6.9%
VEA
7.5%

Healthcare

HAWX
6.8%
VEA
7.6%

Communication Services

HAWX
4.9%
VEA
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

HAWX
4.8%
VEA
5.5%

Energy

HAWX
4.8%
VEA
4.7%

Utilities

HAWX
3.0%
VEA
3.0%

Real Estate

HAWX
1.4%
VEA
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAWX vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAWX
HAWX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HAWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HAWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAWX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAWX vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HAWXVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.33

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

2.62

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.87

10.06

+5.80

HAWX vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAWX and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HAWX vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAWX drawdown since its inception was -30.63%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAWX and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAWXVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.63%

-60.68%

+30.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-11.63%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.30%

-13.45%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.47%

-29.71%

+12.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.63%

-35.73%

+5.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.87%

-3.07%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.27%

-13.26%

+8.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

3.02%

-0.75%

Volatility

HAWX vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) is 6.70%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 7.09%. This indicates that HAWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAWXVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.70%

7.09%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.61%

14.74%

-2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.27%

16.79%

-2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.60%

16.76%

-3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.27%

17.21%

-1.94%

HAWX vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAWX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

HAWX vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

HAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than VEA's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAWX
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
2.41%2.80%3.31%2.95%16.94%2.63%2.00%3.23%2.51%2.40%2.49%3.86%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.58%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, HAWX and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to HAWX (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAWX dropped -30.63% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, HAWX leads with 12.50% vs 10.72% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, HAWX has been the lower-risk option at 6.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HAWX has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HAWX.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 2.41% for HAWX.

HAWX tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA 100% Hedged to USD, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HAWX and 0.03% for VEA.

HAWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAWX and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer