HACK vs. GDX
Compare and contrast key facts about ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX).
HACK and GDX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HACK is a passively managed fund by ETFMG that tracks the performance of the Prime Cyber Defense Index. It was launched on Nov 11, 2014. GDX is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index. It was launched on May 22, 2006. Both HACK and GDX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HACK or GDX.
Correlation
The correlation between HACK and GDX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
HACK vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HACK:
0.64
GDX:
1.52
HACK:
0.97
GDX:
2.03
HACK:
1.12
GDX:
1.25
HACK:
0.96
GDX:
1.01
HACK:
2.83
GDX:
5.06
HACK:
4.60%
GDX:
9.19%
HACK:
20.48%
GDX:
30.64%
HACK:
-42.68%
GDX:
-80.57%
HACK:
-12.63%
GDX:
-21.87%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HACK achieves a -2.86% return, which is significantly lower than GDX's 35.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HACK having a 10.52% annualized return and GDX not far behind at 10.32%.
HACK
-2.86%
-5.24%
7.55%
12.82%
16.11%
10.52%
GDX
35.06%
15.31%
14.56%
44.67%
14.43%
10.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HACK vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.53% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HACK vs. GDX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
HACK
GDX
HACK vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) and VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HACK vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
HACK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than GDX's 0.88% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF | 0.14% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.26% | 1.11% | 0.14% | 0.09% | 0.01% | 1.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDX VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF | 0.88% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.65% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% | 0.66% |
Drawdowns
HACK vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HACK drawdown since its inception was -42.68%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACK and GDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HACK vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) has a higher volatility of 8.55% compared to VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) at 7.42%. This indicates that HACK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.