PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSUS vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSUS vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GSUS having a 10.67% return and VTI slightly higher at 11.20%.


GSUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.20%
YTD
10.67%
6M
10.52%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
22.74%
5Y*
13.64%
10Y*

VTI

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.99%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.09%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSUS vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GSUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF
10.67%18.11%25.25%27.74%-19.82%27.13%34.82%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.20%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%37.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GSUS and VTI is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2020

0.98

The correlation between GSUS and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSUS vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSUS
VTI

Technology

35.6%
33.5%

Communication Services

11.9%
10.3%

Financial Services

11.7%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
10.0%

Healthcare

8.7%
9.2%

Industrials

8.0%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.7%

Energy

3.6%
3.7%

Utilities

2.2%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.0%

Technology

GSUS
35.6%
VTI
33.5%

Communication Services

GSUS
11.9%
VTI
10.3%

Financial Services

GSUS
11.7%
VTI
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GSUS
10.2%
VTI
10.0%

Healthcare

GSUS
8.7%
VTI
9.2%

Industrials

GSUS
8.0%
VTI
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

GSUS
4.9%
VTI
4.7%

Energy

GSUS
3.6%
VTI
3.7%

Utilities

GSUS
2.2%
VTI
2.3%

Real Estate

GSUS
1.7%
VTI
2.4%

Basic Materials

GSUS
1.7%
VTI
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSUS vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSUS
GSUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GSUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
GSUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSUS vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSUSVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.17

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.70

14.62

-0.92

GSUS vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSUS and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSUSVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.33

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.73

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.51

+0.62

Drawdowns

GSUS vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSUSVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.62%

-55.45%

+29.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-8.92%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.07%

-19.30%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.62%

-25.36%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.72%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-8.03%

+2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

1.93%

+0.10%

Volatility

GSUS vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 2.91% and 2.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSUSVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

2.96%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.05%

9.13%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.00%

12.17%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.05%

17.40%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

18.30%

-1.24%

GSUS vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSUS vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.04%1.19%1.32%1.51%1.13%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, GSUS and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTI has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to GSUS (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 5-year performance, GSUS leads with 13.64% vs 12.69% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSUS has performed better with a 13.64% return vs 12.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for GSUS.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.98% for GSUS.

GSUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSUS and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer