GSSQX vs. FLCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Insights Fund (GSSQX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX).
GSSQX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on May 24, 1991. FLCPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 2, 2016.
Performance
GSSQX vs. FLCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSSQX vs. FLCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSSQX Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Insights Fund | -8.83% | 15.15% | 51.06% | 23.14% | -19.63% | 28.81% | 17.81% | 25.41% | -6.81% | 23.45% |
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund | -7.05% | 17.84% | 25.08% | 26.25% | -18.06% | 28.61% | 18.24% | 31.59% | -4.38% | 21.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSSQX achieves a -8.83% return, which is significantly lower than FLCPX's -7.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSSQX having a 14.29% annualized return and FLCPX not far behind at 13.75%.
GSSQX
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -7.63%
- YTD
- -8.83%
- 6M
- -6.08%
- 1Y
- 12.79%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- 14.29%
FLCPX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -7.70%
- YTD
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -4.58%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 17.20%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSSQX vs. FLCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSSQX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCPX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSSQX vs. FLCPX — Risk / Return Rank
GSSQX
FLCPX
GSSQX vs. FLCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Insights Fund (GSSQX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSSQX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | 0.84 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 1.30 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.20 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 1.00 | -0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.50 | 4.86 | -1.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSSQX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 0.84 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.67 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.76 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.82 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSSQX and FLCPX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GSSQX vs. FLCPX - Dividend Comparison
GSSQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.77%, more than FLCPX's 0.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSSQX Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Insights Fund | 13.77% | 12.56% | 31.49% | 2.52% | 0.73% | 26.89% | 4.31% | 1.37% | 4.35% | 10.37% | 4.05% | 4.01% |
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund | 0.60% | 0.56% | 6.11% | 7.05% | 11.23% | 10.38% | 3.93% | 1.74% | 2.18% | 1.57% | 0.76% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GSSQX vs. FLCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSSQX drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, which is greater than FLCPX's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSQX and FLCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSSQX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.61% | -33.87% | -21.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | -12.14% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.23% | -24.40% | -5.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.47% | -33.87% | -0.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.27% | -8.89% | -2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.85% | -4.24% | -5.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 2.56% | +0.40% |
Volatility
GSSQX vs. FLCPX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Insights Fund (GSSQX) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) at 4.24%. This indicates that GSSQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSSQX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 4.24% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.18% | 9.09% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.62% | 18.14% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.98% | 17.03% | +6.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.83% | 18.12% | +3.71% |