PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIMX vs. EMEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GSIMX vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GSIMX vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIMX achieves a 3.78% return, which is significantly lower than EMEQ's 12.19% return.


GSIMX

1D
0.60%
1M
-6.12%
YTD
3.78%
6M
7.89%
1Y
15.89%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*

EMEQ

1D
4.30%
1M
-13.54%
YTD
12.19%
6M
30.58%
1Y
80.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GSIMX vs. EMEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIMX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than EMEQ's 0.86% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GSIMX vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIMX
GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

EMEQ
EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIMX vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSIMXEMEQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

2.72

-1.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

3.21

-1.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.47

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

4.46

-2.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.41

18.19

-10.78

GSIMX vs. EMEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the EMEQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIMX and EMEQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSIMXEMEQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

2.72

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

1.83

-1.01

Correlation

The correlation between GSIMX and EMEQ is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GSIMX vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison

GSIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than EMEQ's 2.46% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
4.93%5.12%11.18%2.36%4.89%2.23%0.18%0.65%0.53%0.16%
EMEQ
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.46%2.76%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GSIMX vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIMX drawdown since its inception was -28.84%, which is greater than EMEQ's maximum drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIMX and EMEQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIMXEMEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.84%

-19.99%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-17.91%

+9.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.12%

-14.38%

+8.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-4.07%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

4.40%

-2.25%

Volatility

GSIMX vs. EMEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) is 4.78%, while Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a volatility of 17.37%. This indicates that GSIMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GSIMXEMEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

17.37%

-12.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.35%

23.87%

-16.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.47%

29.84%

-17.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.42%

27.51%

-13.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

27.51%

-11.74%