GS vs. VTI
GS (The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) is a stock, while VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Over the past 10 years, GS returned 23.44%/yr vs 15.05%/yr for VTI. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
GS vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GS achieves a 19.58% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, GS has outperformed VTI with an annualized return of 23.44%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively lower 15.05% annualized return.
GS
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- 15.76%
- YTD
- 19.58%
- 6M
- 25.65%
- 1Y
- 75.87%
- 3Y*
- 51.11%
- 5Y*
- 24.59%
- 10Y*
- 23.44%
VTI
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- 28.18%
- 3Y*
- 22.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
GS vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 19.58% | 56.64% | 52.03% | 15.91% | -7.87% | 47.61% | 17.45% | 40.48% | -33.53% | 7.73% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 11.20% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between GS and VTI is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2001 | 0.69 |
The correlation between GS and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GS vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
GS
VTI
GS vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GS | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.42 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.93 | 3.17 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.17 | 14.62 | -1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GS | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 2.33 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.73 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.82 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.51 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
GS vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GS drawdown since its inception was -78.84%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GS and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GS | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.84% | -55.45% | -23.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.42% | -8.92% | -10.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.90% | -19.30% | -11.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.84% | -25.36% | -7.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.75% | -35.00% | -13.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -0.72% | -1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.63% | -8.03% | -14.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.78% | 1.93% | +3.85% |
Volatility
GS vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.96%. This indicates that GS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GS | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 2.96% | +5.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.06% | 9.13% | +12.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.25% | 12.17% | +15.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.86% | 17.40% | +10.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.76% | 18.30% | +11.46% |
Dividends
GS vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1.63% | 1.59% | 2.01% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GS and VTI have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GS has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to VTI (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GS dropped -78.84% vs VTI's -55.45%.
GS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GS and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer