GQETX vs. ACUSX
Compare and contrast key facts about GMO Quality Fund (GQETX) and Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund (ACUSX).
GQETX is managed by GMO. It was launched on Feb 6, 2004. ACUSX is managed by Advisors Capital. It was launched on Mar 18, 2021.
Performance
GQETX vs. ACUSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GQETX vs. ACUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQETX GMO Quality Fund | -6.09% | 19.61% | 17.76% | 28.94% | -15.33% | 25.59% |
ACUSX Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund | -0.93% | 13.11% | 15.45% | 17.27% | -21.05% | 15.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GQETX achieves a -6.09% return, which is significantly lower than ACUSX's -0.93% return.
GQETX
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- -6.09%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 12.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- 14.96%
ACUSX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- -0.93%
- 6M
- -0.86%
- 1Y
- 13.90%
- 3Y*
- 13.20%
- 5Y*
- 6.25%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GQETX vs. ACUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GQETX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ACUSX's 1.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GQETX vs. ACUSX — Risk / Return Rank
GQETX
ACUSX
GQETX vs. ACUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Quality Fund (GQETX) and Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund (ACUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GQETX | ACUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 0.96 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | 1.45 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.22 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.42 | -0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.16 | 6.64 | -2.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GQETX | ACUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 0.96 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.01 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.01 | +0.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between GQETX and ACUSX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GQETX vs. ACUSX - Dividend Comparison
GQETX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.88%, while ACUSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQETX GMO Quality Fund | 11.88% | 11.16% | 3.91% | 3.43% | 11.85% | 10.19% | 13.61% | 8.08% | 21.66% | 8.10% | 3.56% | 17.25% |
ACUSX Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GQETX vs. ACUSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GQETX drawdown since its inception was -39.99%, smaller than the maximum ACUSX drawdown of -96.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQETX and ACUSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GQETX | ACUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.99% | -96.85% | +56.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.76% | -6.92% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.22% | -96.85% | +72.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.42% | -96.00% | +86.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.02% | -29.62% | +24.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 2.24% | +1.00% |
Volatility
GQETX vs. ACUSX - Volatility Comparison
GMO Quality Fund (GQETX) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Advisors Capital US Dividend Fund (ACUSX) at 4.08%. This indicates that GQETX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GQETX | ACUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 4.08% | +1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.74% | 7.92% | +1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.65% | 15.39% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 1,173.45% | -1,157.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 1,169.27% | -1,152.24% |