PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GPIX vs. HDLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GPIX vs. HDLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GPIX vs. HDLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GPIX achieves a -2.58% return, which is significantly lower than HDLB's 15.23% return.


GPIX

1D
0.63%
1M
-3.83%
YTD
-2.58%
6M
0.32%
1Y
17.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HDLB

1D
-2.03%
1M
-9.81%
YTD
15.23%
6M
5.83%
1Y
18.66%
3Y*
24.29%
5Y*
14.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GPIX vs. HDLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GPIX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than HDLB's 1.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GPIX vs. HDLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

HDLB
HDLB Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
HDLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDLB Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
HDLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDLB Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GPIX vs. HDLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIX) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GPIXHDLBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

0.57

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.54

0.95

+0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.13

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

0.86

+0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.95

2.89

+5.05

GPIX vs. HDLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the HDLB Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GPIX and HDLB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GPIXHDLBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

0.57

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.45

0.12

+1.34

Correlation

The correlation between GPIX and HDLB is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GPIX vs. HDLB - Dividend Comparison

GPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.66%, less than HDLB's 11.03% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF
8.66%8.01%7.45%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDLB
ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B
11.03%12.20%10.09%12.36%10.86%8.07%16.23%0.97%

Drawdowns

GPIX vs. HDLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GPIX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum HDLB drawdown of -78.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPIX and HDLB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GPIXHDLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.50%

-78.70%

+61.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

-20.94%

+9.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.53%

-9.81%

+5.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.54%

-27.92%

+26.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

6.26%

-4.04%

Volatility

GPIX vs. HDLB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIX) is 5.11%, while ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB) has a volatility of 8.40%. This indicates that GPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GPIXHDLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

8.40%

-3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.44%

20.47%

-12.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.02%

32.76%

-15.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.06%

30.43%

-16.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.06%

43.94%

-29.88%