GPICX vs. MWLDX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX) and Metropolitan West Low Duration Bond Fund (MWLDX).
GPICX is managed by GuidePath. It was launched on Apr 30, 2018. MWLDX is managed by Metropolitan West Funds. It was launched on Mar 31, 1997.
Performance
GPICX vs. MWLDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPICX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly higher than MWLDX's 0.02% return.
GPICX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 2.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.35%
- 10Y*
- —
MWLDX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 3.43%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 1.65%
- 10Y*
- 1.88%
GPICX vs. MWLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPICX GuidepathConservative Income Fund | 0.41% | 3.49% | 4.73% | 4.87% | -1.67% | 0.08% | -0.23% | 2.30% | 0.80% |
MWLDX Metropolitan West Low Duration Bond Fund | 0.02% | 5.72% | 3.79% | 4.82% | -5.70% | -0.33% | 3.27% | 4.24% | 1.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between GPICX and MWLDX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners. Combining low-correlation assets is one of the most reliable ways to reduce portfolio risk without sacrificing expected returns.
GPICX vs. MWLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPICX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MWLDX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GPICX vs. MWLDX — Risk / Return Rank
GPICX
MWLDX
GPICX vs. MWLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX) and Metropolitan West Low Duration Bond Fund (MWLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPICX | MWLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.60 | 1.77 | +0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.84 | 3.04 | +0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.98 | 1.41 | +0.56 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.74 | 2.94 | +2.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.43 | 10.70 | +22.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPICX | MWLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 1.77 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.14 | 0.58 | +1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.76 | 1.27 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
GPICX vs. MWLDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPICX drawdown since its inception was -3.10%, smaller than the maximum MWLDX drawdown of -19.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPICX and MWLDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPICX | MWLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.10% | -19.48% | +16.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.52% | -1.29% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.79% | -8.36% | +5.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.82% | +0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.57% | -1.26% | +0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.09% | 0.36% | -0.27% |
Volatility
GPICX vs. MWLDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX) is 0.36%, while Metropolitan West Low Duration Bond Fund (MWLDX) has a volatility of 0.63%. This indicates that GPICX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MWLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GPICX | MWLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.36% | 0.63% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.56% | 1.33% | -0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15% | 2.15% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.10% | 2.83% | -1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.07% | 2.23% | -1.16% |
Dividends
GPICX vs. MWLDX - Dividend Comparison
GPICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than MWLDX's 3.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPICX GuidepathConservative Income Fund | 3.67% | 3.86% | 4.53% | 4.23% | 1.51% | 0.48% | 0.57% | 1.67% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MWLDX Metropolitan West Low Duration Bond Fund | 3.26% | 3.75% | 3.71% | 3.22% | 1.56% | 0.69% | 1.39% | 2.41% | 2.50% | 1.38% | 1.52% | 1.12% |