GOOI.L vs. SPYY.L

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP (GOOI.L) and IncomeShares S&P500 Options (0DTE) ETP (SPYY.L).

GOOI.L and SPYY.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GOOI.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Sep 26, 2024. SPYY.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Aug 27, 2024.

Performance

GOOI.L vs. SPYY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP (GOOI.L) and IncomeShares S&P500 Options (0DTE) ETP (SPYY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GOOI.L vs. SPYY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GOOI.L IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP	-10.17%	45.15%	17.03%
SPYY.L IncomeShares S&P500 Options (0DTE) ETP	-10.77%	16.00%	-7.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOOI.L achieves a -10.17% return, which is significantly higher than SPYY.L's -10.77% return.

GOOI.L

• 1D: 2.23%
• 1M: -7.10%
• YTD: -10.17%
• 6M: 4.47%
• 1Y: 57.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPYY.L

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -7.50%
• YTD: -10.77%
• 6M: -6.81%
• 1Y: 7.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOOI.L vs. SPYY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOOI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYY.L's 0.45% expense ratio.

GOOI.L

IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP

SPYY.L

IncomeShares S&P500 Options (0DTE) ETP

Return for Risk

GOOI.L vs. SPYY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOOI.L

GOOI.L Risk / Return Rank: 90
GOOI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
GOOI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GOOI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 87
GOOI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
GOOI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 86

SPYY.L

SPYY.L Risk / Return Rank: 26
SPYY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
SPYY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
SPYY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 30
SPYY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
SPYY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOOI.L vs. SPYY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP (GOOI.L) and IncomeShares S&P500 Options (0DTE) ETP (SPYY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GOOI.L	SPYY.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	0.49	+1.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	0.70	+2.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.12	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	0.46	+2.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.45	1.43	+9.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GOOI.L vs. SPYY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOOI.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the SPYY.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOOI.L and SPYY.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GOOI.L	SPYY.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.18	0.49	+1.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.24	-0.06	+1.29

Correlation

The correlation between GOOI.L and SPYY.L is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GOOI.L vs. SPYY.L - Dividend Comparison

GOOI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.08%, less than SPYY.L's 72.85% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
GOOI.L IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP	15.19%	11.19%	2.00%
SPYY.L IncomeShares S&P500 Options (0DTE) ETP	59.25%	82.07%	2.84%

Drawdowns

GOOI.L vs. SPYY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOOI.L drawdown since its inception was -26.69%, which is greater than SPYY.L's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOOI.L and SPYY.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOOI.L	SPYY.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.69%	-17.71%	-8.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.33%	-11.78%	-6.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.50%	-11.75%	-4.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.55%	-4.43%	-2.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.08%	3.79%	+1.29%

Volatility

GOOI.L vs. SPYY.L - Volatility Comparison

IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP (GOOI.L) has a higher volatility of 6.47% compared to IncomeShares S&P500 Options (0DTE) ETP (SPYY.L) at 3.69%. This indicates that GOOI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GOOI.L	SPYY.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.47%	3.69%	+2.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.38%	8.40%	+7.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.47%	14.58%	+11.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.06%	14.40%	+11.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.06%	14.40%	+11.66%